Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25790795›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2015

Tibetan women's perspectives and satisfaction with delivery care in a rural birth center.

Jessica D Gipson, Kunchok Gyaltsen, Lhusham Gyal, Tsering Kyi, Andrew L Hicks, Anne R Pebley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jessica D GipsonDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA; California Center for Population Research, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: jgipson@ucla.edu.
Kunchok GyaltsenTso-ngon (Qinghai) University Tibetan Medical College (TUTMC), Xining City, Qinghai Province, China; Kumbum Tibetan Medical Hospital, Kumbum Monastery, Lusar (CH: Huangzhong), Qinghai Province, China.
Lhusham GyalTso-ngon (Qinghai) University Tibetan Medical College (TUTMC), Xining City, Qinghai Province, China.
Tsering KyiTibetan Birth and Training Center, Tongren County of Huangnan Prefecture, Qinghai Province, China.
Andrew L HicksCalifornia Center for Population Research, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Anne R PebleyDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA; California Center for Population Research, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

Statistics and Methods CoreR24HD041022 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI COSTA, DORA L · 2001 to 2016
$10.1M
Social Context and Fertility: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Survey DevelopmentK01HD067677 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GIPSON, JESSICA DIANE · 2011 to 2015
$635k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD067677NICHD NIH HHS K01HD067677NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify sociodemographic characteristics and factors involved in Tibetan women's decisions to deliver at the Tibetan Birth and Training Center (TBTC) in rural western China.

methodsIn the present mixed-methods study, a random sample of married women who delivered at the TBTC between June 2011 and June 2012 were surveyed. Additionally, four focus group discussions were conducted among married women living in the TBTC catchment area. Descriptive analyses were conducted, and dominant themes were identified.

resultsIn focus group discussions, women (n=33) reported that improved roads and transportation meant that access to health facilities was easier than in the past. Although some of the 114 survey participants voiced negative perceptions of healthcare facilities and providers, 99 (86.8%) indicated that they chose to deliver at the TBTC because they preferred to have a doctor present. Most women (75 [65.8%]) said their mother/mother-in-law made the final decision about delivery location. Women valued logistic and cultural aspects of the TBTC, and 108 (94.7%) said that they would recommend the TBTC to a friend.

conclusionStudy participants preferred delivery care that combines safety and comfort. The findings highlight avenues for further promotion of facility delivery among populations with lower rates of skilled deliveries.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAdolescentAdultBirthing CentersCulturally Competent CareDecision MakingDelivery, ObstetricFamily RelationsFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Services AccessibilityHome ChildbirthHumansPerceptionPhysician-Patient RelationsRural Health ServicesDelivery careEthnic minority populationsFacility deliveryHealth facilityTibet

Identifiers

PMID25790795
PMCPMC7015399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.