Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25790380›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2015

From subject to participant: ethics and the evolving role of community in health research.

Elizabeth Bromley, Lisa Mikesell, Felica Jones, Dmitry Khodyakov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Engaging participants with research findings: A rights-informed approach.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Ethical issues in participatory arts methods for young people with adverse childhood experiences.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Bladder Health Experiences, Perceptions and Knowledge of Sexual and Gender Minorities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth BromleyElizabeth Bromley is with the Semel Institute Center for Health Services and Society, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles and the VA Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA. Lisa Mikesell is with the Communication Department, School of Communication and Information and the Institute of Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. Felica Jones is with Healthy African American Families II, Los Angeles, CA. Dmitry Khodyakov is with the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
Lisa Mikesell
Felica Jones
Dmitry Khodyakov

Funding

The Impact of Partnerships with Community on Research IntegrityR21ES022093 · NIEHS · RAND CORPORATION · PI BROMLEY, ELIZABETH A, KHODYAKOV, DMITRY · 2012 to 2013
$451k
NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES022093NIEHS NIH HHS R21ES02293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Belmont Report principles focus on the well-being of the research subject, yet community-engaged investigators often eschew the role of subject for that of participant. We conducted semistructured interviews with 29 community and academic investigators working on 10 community-engaged studies. Interviews elicited perspectives on ethical priorities and ethical challenges. Interviewees drew on the Belmont Report to describe 4 key principles of ethical community-engaged research (embodying ethical action, respecting participants, generalizing beneficence, and negotiating justice). However, novel aspects of the participant role were the source of most ethical challenges. We theorize that the shift in ethical focus from subject to participant will pose new ethical dilemmas for community-engaged investigators and for other constituents interested in increasing community involvement in health research.

Indexed as

Ethics, ResearchCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCooperative BehaviorFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansMaleMental Health ServicesNegotiatingResearch Personnel

Identifiers

PMID25790380
PMCPMC4386538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.