Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25789990›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Structure, dynamics, and interaction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) DprE1 and DprE2 examined by molecular modeling, simulation, and electrostatic studies.

Isha Bhutani, Saurabh Loharch, Pawan Gupta, Rethi Madathil, Raman Parkesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Regulation of ManLAM-Related Gene Expression inInfection and drug resistance · 2022
    Article
  7. Anti-tuberculosis drug developmentFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isha BhutaniInstitute of Microbial Technology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Chandigarh 160036, India.
Saurabh LoharchInstitute of Microbial Technology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Chandigarh 160036, India.
Pawan GuptaInstitute of Microbial Technology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Chandigarh 160036, India.
Rethi MadathilInstitute of Microbial Technology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Chandigarh 160036, India.
Raman ParkeshInstitute of Microbial Technology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Chandigarh 160036, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The enzymes decaprenylphosphoryl-β-D-ribose oxidase (DprE1) and decaprenylphosphoryl-β-D-ribose-2-epimerase (DprE2) catalyze epimerization of decaprenylphosporyl ribose (DPR) todecaprenylphosporyl arabinose (DPA) and are critical for the survival of Mtb. Crystal structures of DprE1 so far reported display significant disordered regions and no structural information is known for DprE2. We used homology modeling, protein threading, molecular docking and dynamics studies to investigate the structural and dynamic features of Mtb DprE1 and DprE2 and DprE1-DprE2 complex. A three-dimensional model for DprE2 was generated using the threading approach coupled with ab initio modeling. A 50 ns simulation of DprE1 and DprE2 revealed the overall stability of the structures. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) demonstrated the convergence of sampling in both DprE1 and DprE2. In DprE1, residues in the 269-330 area showed considerable fluctuation in agreement with the regions of disorder observed in the reported crystal structures. In DprE2, large fluctuations were detected in residues 95-113, 146-157, and 197-226. The study combined docking and MD simulation studies to map and characterize the key residues involved in DprE1-DprE2 interaction. A 60 ns MD simulation for DprE1-DprE2 complex was also performed. Analysis of data revealed that the docked complex is stabilized by H-bonding, hydrophobic and ionic interactions. The key residues of DprE1 involved in DprE1-DprE2 interactions belong to the disordered region. We also examined the docked complex of DprE1-BTZ043 to investigate the binding pocket of DprE1 and its interactions with the inhibitor BTZ043. In summary, we hypothesize that DprE1-DprE2 interaction is crucial for the synthesis of DPA and DprE1-DprE2 complex may be a new therapeutic target amenable to pharmacological validation. The findings have important implications in tuberculosis (TB) drug discovery and will facilitate drug development efforts against TB.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryAlcohol OxidoreductasesAntitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsCrystallography, X-RayHumansModels, MolecularMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationMycobacterium tuberculosisSpiro CompoundsThiazinesTuberculosis2-(2-methyl-1,4-dioxa-8-azaspiro(4.5)dec-8-yl)-8-nitro-6-(trifluoromethyl)-4H-1,3-benzothiazin-4-oneAlcohol OxidoreductasesAntitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsDprE1 protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosisSpiro CompoundsThiazines

Identifiers

PMID25789990
PMCPMC4366402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.