Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25789852›Full record

ReviewCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2015

Cell cycle, cytoskeleton dynamics and beyond: the many functions of cyclins and CDK inhibitors.

Nawal Bendris, Bénédicte Lemmers, Jean Marie Blanchard

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Methyl alcohol extract of marine green algaNutrition research and practice · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Novel CDKL5 targets identified in human iPSC-derived neurons.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Heliyon · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nawal Bendrisa Institut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier; CNRS; Montpellier; France; Université Montpellier 2 ; Place Eugène Bataillon; Montpellier , France.
Bénédicte Lemmers
Jean Marie Blanchard
Institut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While targeting experiments carried out on the genes encoding many cell cycle regulators have challenged our views of cell cycle control, they also suggest that redundancy might not be the only explanation for the observed perplexing phenotypes. Indeed, several observations hint at functions of cyclins and CDK inhibitors that cannot be accounted for by their sole role as kinase regulators. They are found involved in many cellular transactions, depending or not on CDKs that are not directly linked to cell cycle control, but participating to general mechanisms such as transcription, DNA repair or cytoskeleton dynamics. In this review we discuss the roles that these alternative functions might have in cancer cell proliferation and migration that sometime even challenge their definition as proliferation markers.

Indexed as

Cell CycleAnimalsCell NucleusCyclin D1Cyclin-Dependent KinasesCyclin ECyclinsCytoplasmCytoskeletonDNA DamageDNA RepairEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionFemaleHumansInterphaseMaleCyclin D1Cyclin-Dependent KinasesCyclin ECyclinscytoskeletonEMTinvasionmitosisRho GTPasestranscription

Identifiers

PMID25789852
PMCPMC4614797
OpenAlexW1649386167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.