Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25789847›Full record

ArticleMolecular carcinogenesis2016

Phytochemical regulation of the tumor suppressive microRNA, miR-34a, by p53-dependent and independent responses in human breast cancer cells.

Kris G Hargraves, Lin He, Gary L Firestone

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular carcinogenesis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Nutrients · 2020
    Review
  14. Chemopreventive and Therapeutic Efficacy ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Artesunate promotes Th1 differentiation from CD4+ T cells to enhance cell apoptosis in ovarian cancer via miR-142.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kris G HargravesDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, The Cancer Research Laboratory, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Lin HeDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, The Cancer Research Laboratory, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Gary L FirestoneDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, The Cancer Research Laboratory, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Transcriptional &cell cycle control by dietary indolesR01CA102360 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI FIRESTONE, GARY L · 2004 to 2008
$1.3M
Indolecarbinol target proteins and anti-cancer signaling in human melanoma cellsR01CA164095 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI FIRESTONE, GARY L · 2012 to 2015
$862k
NCI NIH HHS CA102360NCI NIH HHS CA164095NCI NIH HHS R01 CA102360NCI NIH HHS R01 CA164095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumor suppressive microRNA miR-34a is transcriptionally regulated by p53 and shown to inhibit breast cancer cell proliferation as well as being a marker of increased disease free survival. Indole-3-carbinol (I3C) derived from cruciferous vegetables, artemisinin, extracted from the sweet wormwood plant, and artesunate, a semi-synthetic derivative of artemisinin, are phytochemicals with anti-tumorigenic properties however, little is known about the role of microRNAs in their mechanism of action. Human breast cancer cells expressing wild-type (MCF-7) or mutant p53 (T47D) were treated with a concentration range and time course of each phytochemical under conditions of cell cycle arrest as detected by flow cytometry to examine the potential connection between miR-34a expression and their anti-proliferative responses. Real-time PCR and western blot analysis of extracted RNA and total protein revealed artemsinin and artesunate increased miR-34a expression in a dose-dependent manner correlating with down-regulation of the miR-34a target gene, CDK4. I3C stimulation of miR-34a expression required functional p53, whereas, both artemisinin and artesunate up-regulated miR-34a expression regardless of p53 mutational status or in the presence of dominant negative p53. Phytochemical treatments inhibited the luciferase activity of a construct containing the wild-type 3'UTR of CDK4, but not those with a mutated miR-34a binding site, whereas, transfection of miR-34a inhibitors ablated the phytochemical mediated down-regulation of CDK4 and induction of cell cycle arrest. Our results suggest that miR-34a is an essential component of the anti-proliferative activities of I3C, artemisinin, and artesunate and demonstrate that both wild-type p53 dependent and independent pathways are responsible for miR-34a induction.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicArtemisininsArtesunateBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Dose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansIndolesMCF-7 CellsMicroRNAsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Antineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicartemisininArtemisininsArtesunateCDK4 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4indole-3-carbinolIndolesMicroRNAsMIRN34 microRNA, humanTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53anti-proliferative responseartemisininartesunateCDK4Indole-3-carbinol

Identifiers

PMID25789847
PMCPMC4905729
OpenAlexW1913764854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.