Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25789707›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of investigative dermatology2015

MITF Modulates Therapeutic Resistance through EGFR Signaling.

Zhenyu Ji, Yiyin Erin Chen, Raj Kumar, Michael Taylor, Ching-Ni Jenny Njauw, Benchun Miao, Dennie T Frederick, Jennifer A Wargo, Keith T Flaherty, Göran Jönsson and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of investigative dermatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. iScience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. NRF2 Enables EGFR Signaling in Melanoma Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhenyu JiWellman Center for Photomedicine/Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Yiyin Erin ChenWellman Center for Photomedicine/Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Raj KumarWellman Center for Photomedicine/Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael TaylorWellman Center for Photomedicine/Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ching-Ni Jenny NjauwWellman Center for Photomedicine/Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Benchun MiaoWellman Center for Photomedicine/Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Dennie T FrederickMGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jennifer A WargoSurgical Oncology and Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Keith T FlahertyMGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Göran JönssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Hensin TsaoWellman Center for Photomedicine/Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: htsao@mgh.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USLund University · SEThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Transcriptional mechanisms and melanomaP01CA163222 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DAVID E FISHER · 2013 to 2026
$25.3M
Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Consortium Career Development Program in Clinical OncologyK12CA087723 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI David Tsai Ting · 2002 to 2026
$17.9M
Training Program in Cancer Biology and TherapeuticsT32CA071345 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Daniel A. Haber, Lecia V. Sequist · 1997 to 2026
$10.6M
DERMATOLOGY TRAINING GRANTT32AR007098 · NIAMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI THOMAS S. KUPPER · 1986 to 2026
$8.1M
Molecular Risk Assessment in Hereditary MelanomaK24CA149202 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TSAO, HENSIN · 2010 to 2019
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS 5T32CA071345NCI NIH HHS CA149202NCI NIH HHS K12 CA087723NCI NIH HHS K24 CA149202NCI NIH HHS P01 CA163222NCI NIH HHS P01CA163222NCI NIH HHS T32 CA071345NIAMS NIH HHS 5T32AR007098NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR007098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Response to targeted therapies varies significantly despite shared oncogenic mutations. Nowhere is this more apparent than in BRAF (V600E)-mutated melanomas where initial drug response can be striking and yet relapse is commonplace. Resistance to BRAF inhibitors have been attributed to the activation of various receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), although the underlying mechanisms have been largely uncharacterized. Here, we found that EGFR-induced vemurafenib resistance is ligand dependent. We employed whole-genome expression analysis and discovered that vemurafenib resistance correlated with the loss of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF), along with its melanocyte lineage program, and with the activation of EGFR signaling. An inverse relationship between MITF, vemurafenib resistance, and EGFR was then observed in patient samples of recurrent melanoma and was conserved across melanoma cell lines and patients' tumor specimens. Functional studies revealed that MITF depletion activated EGFR signaling and consequently recapitulated the resistance phenotype. In contrast, forced expression of MITF in melanoma and colon cancer cells inhibited EGFR and conferred sensitivity to BRAF/MEK inhibitors. These findings indicate that an "autocrine drug resistance loop" is suppressed by melanocyte lineage signal(s), such as MITF. This resistance loop modulates drug response and could explain the unique sensitivity of melanomas to BRAF inhibition.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationCutaneous Malignant MelanomaDrug Resistance, NeoplasmErbB ReceptorsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansIndolesMelanomaMicrophthalmia-Associated Transcription FactorMolecular Targeted TherapyProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSensitivity and SpecificitySignal TransductionSkin NeoplasmsSulfonamidesTumor Cells, CulturedBRAF protein, humanEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsIndolesMicrophthalmia-Associated Transcription FactorProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSulfonamidesVemurafenib

Identifiers

PMID25789707
PMCPMC4466007
OpenAlexW2045449074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.