Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25789632›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2015

Detailed contact data and the dissemination of Staphylococcus aureus in hospitals.

Thomas Obadia, Romain Silhol, Lulla Opatowski, Laura Temime, Judith Legrand, Anne C M Thiébaut, Jean-Louis Herrmann, Éric Fleury, Didier Guillemot, Pierre-Yves Boëlle and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Thomas ObadiaSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR_S 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, F-75013, Paris, France; INSERM, UMR_S 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, F-75013, Paris, France.
Romain SilholDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lulla OpatowskiInserm UMR 1181 "Biostatistics, Biomathematics, Pharmacoepidemiology and Infectious Diseases" (B2PHI), F-75015, Paris, France; Institut Pasteur, UMR 1181, B2PHI, F-75015, Paris, France; Univ. Versailles St Quentin, UMR 1181, B2PHI, F-78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux.
Laura TemimeLaboratoire MESuRS, Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, 75003, Paris, France.
Judith LegrandUniv Paris-Sud, UMR 0320/UMR8120 Génétique Quantitative et Evolution-Le Moulon, F-91190, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Anne C M ThiébautInserm UMR 1181 "Biostatistics, Biomathematics, Pharmacoepidemiology and Infectious Diseases" (B2PHI), F-75015, Paris, France; Institut Pasteur, UMR 1181, B2PHI, F-75015, Paris, France; Univ. Versailles St Quentin, UMR 1181, B2PHI, F-78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux.
Jean-Louis HerrmannINSERM U1173, UFR Simone Veil, Versailles-Saint-Quentin University, 78180, Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, France; AP-HP, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Service de Microbiologie, F-92380, Garches, France.
Éric FleuryENS de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Laboratoire de l'Informatique du Parallélisme (UMR CNRS 5668-ENS de Lyon-UCB Lyon 1), IXXI Rhône Alpes Complex Systems Institute, Lyon, France; Inria-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique, Montbonnet, France.
Didier GuillemotInserm UMR 1181 "Biostatistics, Biomathematics, Pharmacoepidemiology and Infectious Diseases" (B2PHI), F-75015, Paris, France; Institut Pasteur, UMR 1181, B2PHI, F-75015, Paris, France; Univ. Versailles St Quentin, UMR 1181, B2PHI, F-78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux; AP-HP, Raymond Poincare Hospital, F-92380 Garches, France.
Pierre-Yves BoëlleSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR_S 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, F-75013, Paris, France; INSERM, UMR_S 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, F-75013, Paris, France; AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Département de Santé Publique, F-75571, Paris, France.
I-Bird Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Close proximity interactions (CPIs) measured by wireless electronic devices are increasingly used in epidemiological models. However, no evidence supports that electronically collected CPIs inform on the contacts leading to transmission. Here, we analyzed Staphylococcus aureus carriage and CPIs recorded simultaneously in a long-term care facility for 4 months in 329 patients and 261 healthcare workers to test this hypothesis. In the broad diversity of isolated S. aureus strains, 173 transmission events were observed between participants. The joint analysis of carriage and CPIs showed that CPI paths linking incident cases to other individuals carrying the same strain (i.e. possible infectors) had fewer intermediaries than predicted by chance (P < 0.001), a feature that simulations showed to be the signature of transmission along CPIs. Additional analyses revealed a higher dissemination risk between patients via healthcare workers than via other patients. In conclusion, S. aureus transmission was consistent with contacts defined by electronically collected CPIs, illustrating their potential as a tool to control hospital-acquired infections and help direct surveillance.

Indexed as

Staphylococcus aureusAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overComputational BiologyCross InfectionFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalStaphylococcal InfectionsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25789632
PMCPMC4366219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.