Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25789631›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Effect of extended CT perfusion acquisition time on ischemic core and penumbra volume estimation in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to a large vessel occlusion.

Jordi Borst, Henk A Marquering, Ludo F M Beenen, Olvert A Berkhemer, Jan Willem Dankbaar, Alan J Riordan, Charles B L M Majoie, MR CLEAN investigators

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Segmenting Small Stroke Lesions with Novel Labeling Strategies.Machine learning in clinical neuroimaging : 7th international workshop, MLCN 2024, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2024, Marrakesh, Morocco, October 10, 2024, proceedings. MLCN (Workshop) (7th : 2024 : Marrakesh, Morocco) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. CTP: Time for Patient-Tailored Acquisition Protocols.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2022
    Article
  6. Inferring CT perfusion parameters and uncertainties using a Bayesian approach.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fast nonlinear regression method for CT brain perfusion analysis.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2016
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jordi BorstDepartment of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Henk A MarqueringDepartment of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ludo F M BeenenDepartment of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Olvert A BerkhemerDepartment of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jan Willem DankbaarDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Alan J RiordanDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Charles B L M MajoieDepartment of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
MR CLEAN investigators
Academic Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeIt has been suggested that CT Perfusion acquisition times <60 seconds are too short to capture the complete in and out-wash of contrast in the tissue, resulting in incomplete time attenuation curves. Yet, these short acquisitions times are not uncommon in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to investigate the occurrence of time attenuation curve truncation in 48 seconds CT Perfusion acquisition and to quantify its effect on ischemic core and penumbra estimation in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to a proximal intracranial arterial occlusion of the anterior circulation. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe analyzed CT Perfusion data with 48 seconds and extended acquisition times, assuring full time attenuation curves, of 36 patients. Time attenuation curves were classified as complete or truncated. Ischemic core and penumbra volumes resulting from both data sets were compared by median paired differences and interquartile ranges. Controlled experiments were performed using a digital CT Perfusion phantom to investigate the effect of time attenuation curve truncation on ischemic core and penumbra estimation.

resultsIn 48 seconds acquisition data, truncation was observed in 24 (67%) cases for the time attenuation curves in the ischemic core, in 2 cases for the arterial input function and in 5 cases for the venous output function. Analysis of extended data resulted in smaller ischemic cores and larger penumbras with a median difference of 13.2 (IQR: 4.3-26.0) ml (P<0.001) and; 12.4 (IQR: 4.1-25.7) ml (P<0.001), respectively. The phantom data showed increasing ischemic core overestimation with increasing tissue time attenuation curve truncation.

conclusionsTruncation is common in patients with large vessel occlusion and results in repartitioning of the area of hypoperfusion into larger ischemic core and smaller penumbra estimations. Phantom experiments confirmed that truncation results in overestimation of the ischemic core.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain IschemiaCerebrovascular CirculationFemaleHeart VentriclesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerfusion ImagingPhantoms, ImagingStrokeTime FactorsTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID25789631
PMCPMC4366202
OpenAlexW2059233383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.