Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25789497›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2015

Breast cancer stage, surgery, and survival statistics for Idaho's National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program population, 2004-2012.

Christopher J Johnson, Robert Graff, Patti Moran, Charlene Cariou, Susan Bordeaux

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of Rurality on Stage IV Ovarian Cancer at Diagnosis: A Midwest Cancer Registry Cohort Study.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher J JohnsonCancer Data Registry of Idaho, 615 North 7th St, Boise, ID 83701-1278. Email: cjohnson@teamiha.org.
Robert GraffIdaho Department of Health and Welfare, Boise, Idaho.
Patti MoranIdaho Department of Health and Welfare, Boise, Idaho.
Charlene CariouIdaho Department of Health and Welfare, Boise, Idaho.
Susan BordeauxIdaho Department of Health and Welfare, Boise, Idaho.

Funding

IDAHO CANCER PROGRAMSU58DP003881 · DP · IDAHO STATE DEPT OF HEALTH AND WELFARE · PI DISNEY-SPENCER, DIEUWKE · 2012 to 2014
$6.2M
IDAHO APPLICATION FOR NATIONAL PROGRAM OF CANCER REGISTRIES (NPCR)U58DP003882 · DP · IDAHO HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION · PI CARSON, STACEY L · 2012 to 2014
$798k
NCCDPHP CDC HHS 5U58DP003881NCCDPHP CDC HHS 5U58DP003882NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP003881NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP003882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) provides access to breast and cervical cancer screening for low-income, uninsured, and underinsured women in all states and US territories. In Idaho, a rural state with very low breast and cervical cancer screening rates, this program is called Women's Health Check (WHC). The program has been operating continuously since 1997 and served 4,719 enrollees in 2013. The objective of this study was to assess whether disparities existed in cause-specific survival (a net survival measure representing survival of a specified cause of death in the absence of other causes of death) between women screened by WHC and outside WHC and to determine how type of surgery or survival varies with stage at diagnosis.

methodsWHC data were linked to Idaho's central cancer registry to compare stage distribution, type of surgery, and cause-specific survival between women with WHC-linked breast cancer and a comparison group of women whose records did not link to the WHC database (nonlinked breast cancer).

resultsWHC-linked breast cancer was significantly more likely to be diagnosed at a later stage of disease than nonlinked breast cancer. Because of differences in stage distribution between WHC-linked and nonlinked breast cancers, overall age-standardized, cause-specific breast cancer survival proportions diverged over time, with a 5.1 percentage-point deficit in survival among WHC-linked cases at 5 years of follow-up (83.9% vs 89.0%). Differences in type of surgery and cause-specific survival were attenuated when controlling for stage.

conclusionThis study suggests that disparities may exist for Idaho WHC enrollees in the timely diagnosis of breast cancer. To our knowledge, this is the first study to publish comparisons of cause-specific breast cancer survival between NBCCEDP-linked and nonlinked cases.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesAdultAge DistributionBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIdahoInsurance CoverageMammographyMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPreventive Health ServicesProgram EvaluationRegistries

Identifiers

PMID25789497
PMCPMC4372161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.