Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25788973›Full record

ReviewComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2015

PET-specific parameters and radiotracers in theoretical tumour modelling.

Matthew Jennings, Loredana G Marcu, Eva Bezak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew JenningsSchool of Chemistry & Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia ; Department of Medical Physics, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1288-2683
Loredana G MarcuSchool of Chemistry & Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia ; Faculty of Science, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.
Eva BezakSchool of Chemistry & Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia ; Department of Medical Physics, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The innovation of computational techniques serves as an important step toward optimized, patient-specific management of cancer. In particular, in silico simulation of tumour growth and treatment response may eventually yield accurate information on disease progression, enhance the quality of cancer treatment, and explain why certain therapies are effective where others are not. In silico modelling is demonstrated to considerably benefit from information obtainable with PET and PET/CT. In particular, models have successfully integrated tumour glucose metabolism, cell proliferation, and cell oxygenation from multiple tracers in order to simulate tumour behaviour. With the development of novel radiotracers to image additional tumour phenomena, such as pH and gene expression, the value of PET and PET/CT data for use in tumour models will continue to grow. In this work, the use of PET and PET/CT information in in silico tumour models is reviewed. The various parameters that can be obtained using PET and PET/CT are detailed, as well as the radiotracers that may be used for this purpose, their utility, and limitations. The biophysical measures used to quantify PET and PET/CT data are also described. Finally, a list of in silico models that incorporate PET and/or PET/CT data is provided and reviewed.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyCell ProliferationCoordination ComplexesDideoxynucleosidesDiffusionFluorodeoxyglucose F18Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGlucoseHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationHypoxiaMisonidazoleModels, TheoreticalMultimodal ImagingNeoplasmsalovudineCoordination Complexescopper (II) diacetyl-di(N(4)-methylthiosemicarbazone)DideoxynucleosidesFluorodeoxyglucose F18fluoromisonidazoleGlucoseMisonidazoleOrganometallic CompoundsOxygenRadiopharmaceuticalsThiosemicarbazones

Identifiers

PMID25788973
PMCPMC4350968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.