Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25788900›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2015

A genomic comparison of two termites with different social complexity.

Judith Korb, Michael Poulsen, Haofu Hu, Cai Li, Jacobus J Boomsma, Guojie Zhang, Jürgen Liebig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genomic and transcriptomic analyses of the subterranean termiteProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Genome architecture and social evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Eusociality in snapping shrimps is associated with larger genomes and an accumulation of transposable elements.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Why and how do termite kings and queens live so long?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of the mechanisms underpinning ageing and fecundity in social insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. TheHeliyon · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Judith KorbDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute of Biology I, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany.
Michael PoulsenSection for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, Centre for Social Evolution, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, Denmark.
Haofu HuChina National Genebank, BGI-Shenzhen Shenzhen, China.
Cai LiChina National Genebank, BGI-Shenzhen Shenzhen, China ; Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jacobus J BoomsmaSection for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, Centre for Social Evolution, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, Denmark.
Guojie ZhangSection for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, Centre for Social Evolution, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, Denmark ; China National Genebank, BGI-Shenzhen Shenzhen, China.
Jürgen LiebigSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University Tempe, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The termites evolved eusociality and complex societies before the ants, but have been studied much less. The recent publication of the first two termite genomes provides a unique comparative opportunity, particularly because the sequenced termites represent opposite ends of the social complexity spectrum. Zootermopsis nevadensis has simple colonies with totipotent workers that can develop into all castes (dispersing reproductives, nest-inheriting replacement reproductives, and soldiers). In contrast, the fungus-growing termite Macrotermes natalensis belongs to the higher termites and has very large and complex societies with morphologically distinct castes that are life-time sterile. Here we compare key characteristics of genomic architecture, focusing on genes involved in communication, immune defenses, mating biology and symbiosis that were likely important in termite social evolution. We discuss these in relation to what is known about these genes in the ants and outline hypothesis for further testing.

Indexed as

chemical communicationgenomesimmunitysocial insectssocial organizationsymbiosistermitestransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID25788900
PMCPMC4348803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.