Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25788874›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2015

Methamphetamine effects on blood-brain barrier structure and function.

Nicole A Northrop, Bryan K Yamamoto

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Endothelial adenosine AFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Dysfunction of the Neurovascular Unit by Psychostimulant Drugs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicole A NorthropDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Toledo College of Medicine Toledo, OH, USA.
Bryan K YamamotoDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Toledo College of Medicine Toledo, OH, USA.
University of Toledo · US

Funding

METHAMPHETAMINE TOXICITY AND CORTICOSTRIATAL GLUTAMATER01DA007606 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO HEALTH SCI CAMPUS · PI YAMAMOTO, BRYAN K · 1992 to 2016
$5.1M
Methamphetamine, Stress and Brain EndotheliumR01DA035499 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO HEALTH SCI CAMPUS · PI YAMAMOTO, BRYAN K · 2013 to 2017
$2.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA007606NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methamphetamine (Meth) is a widely abuse psychostimulant. Traditionally, studies have focused on the neurotoxic effects of Meth on monoaminergic neurotransmitter terminals. Recently, both in vitro and in vivo studies have investigated the effects of Meth on the BBB and found that Meth produces a decrease in BBB structural proteins and an increase in BBB permeability to various molecules. Moreover, preclinical studies are validated by clinical studies in which human Meth users have increased concentrations of toxins in the brain. Therefore, this review will focus on the structural and functional disruption of the BBB caused by Meth and the mechanisms that contribute to Meth-induced BBB disruption. The review will reveal that the mechanisms by which Meth damages dopamine and serotonin terminals are similar to the mechanisms by which the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is damaged. Furthermore, this review will cover the factors that are known to potentiate the effects of Meth (McCann et al., 1998) on the BBB, such as stress and HIV, both of which are co-morbid conditions associated with Meth abuse. Overall, the goal of this review is to demonstrate that the scope of damage produced by Meth goes beyond damage to monoaminergic neurotransmitter systems to include BBB disruption as well as provide a rationale for investigating therapeutics to treat Meth-induced BBB disruption. Since a breach of the BBB can have a multitude of consequences, therapies directed toward the treatment of BBB disruption may help to ameliorate the long-term neurodegeneration and cognitive deficits produced by Meth and possibly even Meth addiction.

Indexed as

blood-brain barrierglutamatemethamphetamineneuroinflammationoxidative stresstight junction

Identifiers

PMID25788874
PMCPMC4349189
OpenAlexW1970459988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.