Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25788735›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2015

Dissecting the contribution of microtubule behaviour in adventitious root induction.

Mohamad Abu-Abied, Oksana Rogovoy Stelmakh, Inna Mordehaev, Marina Grumberg, Rivka Elbaum, Geoffrey O Wasteneys, Einat Sadot

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohamad Abu-AbiedThe Institute of Plant Sciences, The Volcani Center, ARO, PO Box 6, Bet-Dagan 50250, Israel.
Oksana Rogovoy StelmakhThe Institute of Plant Sciences, The Volcani Center, ARO, PO Box 6, Bet-Dagan 50250, Israel.
Inna MordehaevThe Institute of Plant Sciences, The Volcani Center, ARO, PO Box 6, Bet-Dagan 50250, Israel.
Marina GrumbergThe Institute of Plant Sciences, The Volcani Center, ARO, PO Box 6, Bet-Dagan 50250, Israel.
Rivka ElbaumThe Smith Institute of Plant Sciences and Genetics in Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Geoffrey O WasteneysDepartment of Botany, The University of British Columbia, 6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Einat SadotThe Institute of Plant Sciences, The Volcani Center, ARO, PO Box 6, Bet-Dagan 50250, Israel vhesadot@agri.gov.il.
Agricultural Research Organization · ILHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Induction of adventitious roots (ARs) in recalcitrant plants often culminates in cell division and callus formation rather than root differentiation. Evidence is provided here to suggest that microtubules (MTs) play a role in the shift from cell division to cell differentiation during AR induction. First, it was found that fewer ARs form in the temperature-sensitive mutant mor1-1, in which the MT-associated protein MOR1 is mutated, and in bot1-1, in which the MT-severing protein katanin is mutated. In the two latter mutants, MT dynamics and form are perturbed. By contrast, the number of ARs increased in RIC1-OX3 plants, in which MT bundling is enhanced and katanin is activated. In addition, any1 plants in which cell walls are perturbed made more ARs than wild-type plants. MT perturbations during AR induction in mor1-1 or in wild-type hypocotyls treated with oryzalin led to the formation of amorphous clusters of cells reminiscent of callus. In these cells a specific pattern of polarized light retardation by the cell walls was lost. PIN1 polarization and auxin maxima were hampered and differentiation of the epidermis was inhibited. It is concluded that a fine-tuned crosstalk between MTs, cell walls, and auxin transport is required for proper AR induction.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCell DifferentiationCell DivisionCell WallDinitrobenzenesIndoleacetic AcidsMembrane Transport ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMicrotubulesMutationPlant RootsSulfanilamidesTemperatureArabidopsis ProteinsDinitrobenzenesIndoleacetic AcidsMembrane Transport ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMOR1 protein, ArabidopsisoryzalinPIN1 protein, ArabidopsisSulfanilamidesAdventitious rootsArabidopsisauxincell wallmicrotubuleoryzalin.

Identifiers

PMID25788735
PMCPMC4986881
OpenAlexW2139826093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.