Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25788669›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Temporal dynamics of L5 dendrites in medial prefrontal cortex regulate integration versus coincidence detection of afferent inputs.

Nikolai C Dembrow, Boris V Zemelman, Daniel Johnston

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Intrinsic Dendritic Integration Features of Prefrontal Layer 5 Pyramidal Cell Subclasses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nikolai C DembrowCenter for Learning and Memory, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712 nikolai@ca1.clm.utexas.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-6591
Boris V ZemelmanCenter for Learning and Memory, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2463-4887
Daniel JohnstonCenter for Learning and Memory, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9733-1011
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

CELLULAR INFORMATION PROCESSING IN THE HIPPOCAMPUSR01MH048432 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI JOHNSTON, DANIEL · 1991 to 2012
$3.8M
Neuronal Mechanisms for Working Memory in Prefrontal CortexR01MH094839 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI JOHNSTON, DANIEL, MAUK, MICHAEL D · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS MH048432NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH048432NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distinct brain regions are highly interconnected via long-range projections. How this inter-regional communication occurs depends not only upon which subsets of postsynaptic neurons receive input, but also, and equally importantly, upon what cellular subcompartments the projections target. Neocortical pyramidal neurons receive input onto their apical dendrites. However, physiological characterization of these inputs thus far has been exclusively somatocentric, leaving how the dendrites respond to spatial and temporal patterns of input unexplored. Here we used a combination of optogenetics with multisite electrode recordings to simultaneously measure dendritic and somatic responses to afferent fiber activation in two different populations of layer 5 (L5) pyramidal neurons in the rat medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). We found that commissural inputs evoked monosynaptic responses in both intratelencephalic (IT) and pyramidal tract (PT) dendrites, whereas monosynaptic hippocampal input primarily targeted IT, but not PT, dendrites. To understand the role of dendritic integration in the processing of long-range inputs, we used dynamic clamp to simulate synaptic currents in the dendrites. IT dendrites functioned as temporal integrators that were particularly responsive to dendritic inputs within the gamma frequency range (40-140 Hz). In contrast, PT dendrites acted as coincidence detectors by responding to spatially distributed signals within a narrow time window. Thus, the PFC extracts information from different brain regions through the combination of selective dendritic targeting and the distinct dendritic physiological properties of L5 pyramidal dendrites.

Indexed as

AnimalsDendritesExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsMaleNeurons, AfferentOrgan Culture TechniquesPrefrontal CortexPyramidal CellsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTime Factorschannel rhodopsin 2dendritic integrationprefrontal cortexprojection neurons

Identifiers

PMID25788669
PMCPMC4363381
OpenAlexW1997649998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.