Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25788545›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2015

Borrelia burgdorferi not confirmed in human-biting Amblyomma americanum ticks from the southeastern United States.

Ellen Y Stromdahl, Robyn M Nadolny, Jennifer A Gibbons, Lisa D Auckland, Mary A Vince, Chad E Elkins, Michael P Murphy, Graham J Hickling, Mark W Eshoo, Heather E Carolan and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Tick species infesting humans in the United States.Ticks and tick-borne diseases · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ellen Y StromdahlU.S. Army Public Health Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, USA Ellen.y.stromdahl.civ@mail.mil.
Robyn M NadolnyU.S. Army Public Health Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, USA Department of Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, USA.
Jennifer A GibbonsU.S. Army Edgewood Chemical and Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, USA Science and Technology Corp., Hampton, Virginia, USA.
Lisa D AucklandDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Mary A VinceU.S. Army Public Health Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, USA.
Chad E ElkinsU.S. Army Public Health Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, USA.
Michael P MurphyU.S. Army Public Health Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, USA.
Graham J HicklingCenter for Wildlife Health, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Mark W EshooIbis Biosciences, Carlsbad, California, USA.
Heather E CarolanIbis Biosciences, Carlsbad, California, USA.
Chris D CrowderIbis Biosciences, Carlsbad, California, USA.
Mark A PilgardDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Sarah A HamerDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The predominant human-biting tick throughout the southeastern United States is Amblyomma americanum. Its ability to transmit pathogens causing Lyme disease-like illnesses is a subject of ongoing controversy. Results of previous testing by the Department of Defense Human Tick Test Kit Program and other laboratories indicated that it is highly unlikely that A. americanum transmits any pathogen that causes Lyme disease. In contrast, a recent publication by Clark and colleagues (K. L. Clark, B. Leydet, and S. Hartman, Int. J. Med. Sci. 10:915-931, 2013) reported detection of Lyme group Borrelia in A. americanum using a nested-flagellin-gene PCR. We evaluated this assay by using it and other assays to test 1,097 A. americanum ticks collected from humans. Using the Clark assay, in most samples we observed nonspecific amplification and nonrepeatability of results on subsequent testing of samples. Lack of reaction specificity and repeatability is consistent with mispriming, likely due to high primer concentrations and low annealing temperatures in this protocol. In six suspect-positive samples, Borrelia lonestari was identified by sequencing of an independent gene region; this is not a Lyme group spirochete and is not considered zoonotic. B. burgdorferi was weakly amplified from one pool using some assays, but not others, and attempts to sequence the amplicon of this pool failed, as did attempts to amplify and sequence B. burgdorferi from the five individual samples comprising this pool. Therefore, B. burgdorferi was not confirmed in any sample. Our results do not support the hypothesis that A. americanum ticks are a vector for Lyme group Borrelia infections.

Indexed as

AnimalsBorrelia burgdorferiEntomologyFemaleHumansIxodidaeMaleMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySoutheastern United States

Identifiers

PMID25788545
PMCPMC4400787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.