Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25788402›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2015

High performances of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT in cardiac implantable device infections: A study of 40 patients.

Ghoufrane Tlili, Sana Amraoui, Sana Amroui, Charles Mesguich, Annalisa Rivière, Pierre Bordachar, Elif Hindié, Laurence Bordenave

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Update of the Brazilian Guideline on Nuclear Cardiology - 2020.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Meta-analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Role ofJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2022: positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Diagnostic value ofClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2022
    Article
  11. Accuracy ofJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Nuclear Imaging in Infective Endocarditis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  13. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Usefulness ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  20. Another potential step to improve prosthetic heart valve endocarditis imaging withJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ghoufrane TliliCHU de Bordeaux, Service de Médecine Nucléaire, Bordeaux, France, ghoufrane.tlili@chu-bordeaux.fr.
Sana Amraoui
Sana Amroui
Charles Mesguich
Annalisa Rivière
Pierre Bordachar
Elif Hindié
Laurence Bordenave

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) infections are life-threatening complications. The diagnosis can be difficult to establish. Our purpose is to evaluate the diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET.

methodsForty patients who received work-up for suspected CIED infection were retrospectively included (group 1) and compared with 40 controls (group 2); CIED patients were referred for oncologic PET. PET-CT data were blindly assessed. Interpretation was based on visual analysis of both attenuation-corrected and non-corrected images and a semi-quantitative analysis was performed. The gold standard was bacteriological data of explanted devices or clinical follow-up for at least 1 year.

resultsInfection was present in 18 out of 40 patients of group 1. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of PET-CT were 83%, 95%, 94%, and 88%, respectively. Accuracy was 90%. PET-CT revealed the presence of additional pathological hypermetabolic foci in 28% of cases. PET-CT was negative at implanted devices in all patients of group 2.

conclusion(18)F-FDG PET-CT is helpful in the work-up of suspected CIED infections. It is a potential tool to make the accurate diagnosis of CIED infection and to assess the extent of infection. The promising results in this indication need to be validated in a prospective multicenter study.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDefibrillators, ImplantableEndocarditisFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansImage EnhancementMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingPacemaker, ArtificialPositron-Emission TomographyProsthesis-Related InfectionsRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.