Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25788384›Full record

ArticleHepatology international2015

Efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in combination with irradiation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion.

Hideki Onishi, Kazuhiro Nouso, Shinichiro Nakamura, Kuniaki Katsui, Nozomu Wada, Yuki Morimoto, Koji Miyahara, Yasuto Takeuchi, Kenji Kuwaki, Tetsuya Yasunaka and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers of therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hideki OnishiDepartment of Molecular Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Okayama City, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan, ohnis-h1@cc.okayama-u.ac.jp.
Kazuhiro Nouso
Shinichiro Nakamura
Kuniaki Katsui
Nozomu Wada
Yuki Morimoto
Koji Miyahara
Yasuto Takeuchi
Kenji Kuwaki
Tetsuya Yasunaka
Yasuhiro Miyake
Hidenori Shiraha
Akinobu Takaki
Yoshiyuki Kobayashi
Kohsaku Sakaguchi
Susumu Kanazawa
Kazuhide Yamamoto
Okayama University · JPFukuyama City Hospital · JPOkayama University Hospital · JPTokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe presence of portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) is a poor prognostic factor for patients with hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC). The purpose of this study was to determine the treatment effect of irradiation in combination with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for these patients.

methodsWe retrospectively examined the outcome of 67 HCC patients with PVTT of the main trunk or first branch who received HAIC alone or with concurrent irradiation for PVTT (CCRT).

resultsThirty-four patients received HAIC, and 33 patients received CCRT. The time to progression (TTP) of PVTT in the CCRT group was significantly longer than in the HAIC group (p < 0.01), and the TTP of intrahepatic nodules in the CCRT group tended to be longer than in the HAIC group (p = 0.06). The objective response rates of intrahepatic nodules (52 vs. 18%, p < 0.01) and PVTT (45 vs. 18%, p = 0.01) were both significantly higher in the CCRT group than in the HAIC group, respectively. No significant difference in overall survival was found between the two groups (p = 0.14); however, the median survival time in the CCRT group was longer than that in the HAIC group (12.4 vs. 5.7 months, respectively).

conclusionsCCRT might be a promising treatment for advanced-stage HCC with PVTT. CCRT prolonged the TTP of intrahepatic nodules and PVTT, and it improved the objective response rate of intrahepatic nodules and PVTT.

Indexed as

Radiotherapy, ConformalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, HepatocellularChemoradiotherapyCisplatinDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleFluorouracilHumansInfusions, Intra-ArterialInterferon-alphaCisplatinFluorouracilInterferon-alpha

Identifiers

PMID25788384
OpenAlexW1997766409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.