Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25788162›Full record

SynthesisThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2015

The effect of dose on the antimalarial efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine: a systematic review and pooled analysis of individual patient data.

Worldwide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN) AL Dose Impact Study Group

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02645604 (Artemether-Lumefantrine Resistance Monitoring in Children With Uncomplicated Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria in Mali), which is not on this map. Cited by 58 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02645604 completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Artemether-Lumefantrine Resistance Monitoring in Children With Uncomplicated Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria in Mali

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Ran2016 to 2018Enrolled154ConditionsAccute Falciparum Malaria
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Artemether-Lumefantrine Versus Chloroquine for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Plasmodium knowlesi Malaria: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial CAN KNOW.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Worldwide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN) AL Dose Impact Study Group
Charles Darwin University · AU

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_A900_1119Wellcome Trust 091625Wellcome Trust 093956Wellcome Trust 095066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtemether-lumefantrine is the most widely used artemisinin-based combination therapy for malaria, although treatment failures occur in some regions. We investigated the effect of dosing strategy on efficacy in a pooled analysis from trials done in a wide range of malaria-endemic settings.

methodsWe searched PubMed for clinical trials that enrolled and treated patients with artemether-lumefantrine and were published from 1960 to December, 2012. We merged individual patient data from these trials by use of standardised methods. The primary endpoint was the PCR-adjusted risk of Plasmodium falciparum recrudescence by day 28. Secondary endpoints consisted of the PCR-adjusted risk of P falciparum recurrence by day 42, PCR-unadjusted risk of P falciparum recurrence by day 42, early parasite clearance, and gametocyte carriage. Risk factors for PCR-adjusted recrudescence were identified using Cox's regression model with frailty shared across the study sites.

findingsWe included 61 studies done between January, 1998, and December, 2012, and included 14,327 patients in our analyses. The PCR-adjusted therapeutic efficacy was 97·6% (95% CI 97·4-97·9) at day 28 and 96·0% (95·6-96·5) at day 42. After controlling for age and parasitaemia, patients prescribed a higher dose of artemether had a lower risk of having parasitaemia on day 1 (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0·92, 95% CI 0·86-0·99 for every 1 mg/kg increase in daily artemether dose; p=0·024), but not on day 2 (p=0·69) or day 3 (0·087). In Asia, children weighing 10-15 kg who received a total lumefantrine dose less than 60 mg/kg had the lowest PCR-adjusted efficacy (91·7%, 95% CI 86·5-96·9). In Africa, the risk of treatment failure was greatest in malnourished children aged 1-3 years (PCR-adjusted efficacy 94·3%, 95% CI 92·3-96·3). A higher artemether dose was associated with a lower gametocyte presence within 14 days of treatment (adjusted OR 0·92, 95% CI 0·85-0·99; p=0·037 for every 1 mg/kg increase in total artemether dose).

interpretationThe recommended dose of artemether-lumefantrine provides reliable efficacy in most patients with uncomplicated malaria. However, therapeutic efficacy was lowest in young children from Asia and young underweight children from Africa; a higher dose regimen should be assessed in these groups.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, DrugAdolescentAdultAfricaAgedAged, 80 and overAntimalarialsArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationArtemisininsAsiaChildChild, PreschoolClinical Trials as TopicDNA, ProtozoanDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesAntimalarialsArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationArtemisininsDNA, ProtozoanDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesFluorenes

Identifiers

PMID25788162
PMCPMC4632191
OpenAlexW1843821187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.