ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2015
Computer Aided Semi-Automated Evaluation of HER2 Immunodetection--A Robust Solution for Supporting the Accuracy of Anti HER2 Therapy.
Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Computer-based image analysis in breast pathology.Journal of pathology informatics · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
HER2-positive breast cancers usually benefit from anti-HER2 therapy, thus, HER2 evaluation became inevitable for patient selection. HER2-negative (IHC 0, 1+) and strong positive (IHC 3+) cases can easily be interpreted with immunohistochemistry, but equivocal (IHC 2+) cases require further analysis of HER2 gene amplification using in situ hybridization. Our study aimed to validate digital pathology and automated image analysis for unbiased evaluation of HER2 immunostains. We developed an image segmentation algorithm for analyzing HER2-immunostaining (4B5 clone) in tissue microarrays of breast cancers. Two pathologists assessed 309 microscopic regions of at least 100 tumor cells each--representing all HER2 positivity groups--according to international guidelines either semi-quantitatively or by using the MembraneQuant software. Scoring results were statistically correlated with each other and with FISH data, and almost perfect agreement was found (inter-method Cohen's kappa = 0.872, Spearman-rho = 0.928). When clinical relevance (scoring disagreement that may define erroneous treatment selection) was examined high agreement was found (quadratic weighted kappa = 0.967). Image analysis classified cases with excellent correlation with visual evaluation, therefore, MembraneQuant software proved to be a reliable tool for assessing HER2 immunoreactions and supporting better targeting anti-HER2 therapy. As digital analysis of immunomorphological markers allows permanent archiving, standardization and accurate reviewing of results, it supports quality assurance initiatives in diagnostic pathology--especially of equivocal cases which are hard to interpret.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25788005What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.