Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25787957›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Intrinsic excitability of human motoneurons in biceps brachii versus triceps brachii.

Jessica M Wilson, Christopher K Thompson, Laura C Miller, Charles J Heckman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Nonlinear Input-Output Functions of Motoneurons.Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica M WilsonDepartment of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; jessmwilson@u.northwestern.edu.
Christopher K ThompsonDepartment of Physiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois;
Laura C MillerDepartment of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois; and.
Charles J HeckmanDepartment of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Physiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Interdisciplinary Graduate Education in Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences-RenewalT32EB009406 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI JULIUS P DEWALD, JUN YAO · 2009 to 2026
$2.2M
Reverse Engineering Motor Unit Discharge PatternsR01NS085331 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HECKMAN, CHARLES, POWERS, RANDALL K · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
Training in the Neurobiology of Movement and Rehabilitation SciencesT32HD057845 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI DEWALD, JULIUS P · 2010 to 2014
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB-009406NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB009406NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD-057845NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD057845NINDS NIH HHS NS-085331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intrinsic excitability of spinal motoneurons is mediated in part by the presence of persistent inward currents (PICs), which amplify synaptic input and promote self-sustained firing. Studies using animal models have shown that PICs are greater in extensor motoneurons over flexor motoneurons, but this difference has not yet been demonstrated in humans. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether a similar difference exists in humans by recording from motor units in biceps and triceps brachii during isometric contractions. We compared firing rate profiles of pairs of motor units, in which the firing rate of the lower-threshold "control" unit was used as an indicator of common drive to the higher-threshold "test" unit. The estimated contribution of the PIC was calculated as the difference in firing rate of the control unit at recruitment versus derecruitment of the test unit, a value known as the delta-F (ΔF). We found that ΔF values were significantly higher in triceps brachii (5.4 ± 0.9 imp/s) compared with biceps brachii (3.0 ± 1.4 imp/s; P < 0.001). This difference was still present even after controlling for saturation in firing rate of the control unit, rate modulation of the control unit, and differences in recruitment time between test and control units, which are known to contribute to ΔF variability. We conclude that human elbow flexor and extensor motor units exhibit differences in intrinsic excitability, contributing to different neural motor control strategies between muscle groups.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAgedAnalysis of VarianceElbowElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor NeuronsMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalRecruitment, NeurophysiologicalTorqueelbow extensorselbow flexorsintrinsic excitabilitymotoneuronsneuromodulation

Identifiers

PMID25787957
PMCPMC4468975
OpenAlexW2317801828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.