Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25787952›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Dorsal premotor cortex: neural correlates of reach target decisions based on a color-location matching rule and conflicting sensory evidence.

Émilie Coallier, Thomas Michelet, John F Kalaska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. No Central Executive? Decision Formation Through Multi-Area Population Dynamics.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An abstract categorical decision code in dorsal premotor cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The whole prefrontal cortex is premotor cortex.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Frequency Shifts and Depth Dependence of Premotor Beta Band Activity during Perceptual Decision-Making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Émilie CoallierGroupe de recherche sur le système nerveux central (Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé), Département de Neurosciences, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, succursale Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec, Canada; and.
Thomas MicheletUniversité Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France; and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France.
John F KalaskaGroupe de recherche sur le système nerveux central (Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé), Département de Neurosciences, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, succursale Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec, Canada; and john.francis.kalaska@umontreal.ca.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-67194Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-97944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We recorded single-neuron activity in dorsal premotor (PMd) and primary motor cortex (M1) of two monkeys in a reach-target selection task. The monkeys chose between two color-coded potential targets by determining which target's color matched the predominant color of a multicolored checkerboard-like Decision Cue (DC). Different DCs contained differing numbers of colored squares matching each target. The DCs provided evidence about the correct target ranging from unambiguous (one color only) to very ambiguous and conflicting (nearly equal number of squares of each color). Differences in choice behavior (reach response times and success rates as a function of DC ambiguity) of the monkeys suggested that each applied a different strategy for using the target-choice evidence in the DCs. Nevertheless, the appearance of the DCs evoked a transient coactivation of PMd neurons preferring both potential targets in both monkeys. Reach response time depended both on how long it took activity to increase in neurons that preferred the chosen target and on how long it took to suppress the activity of neurons that preferred the rejected target, in both correct-choice and error-choice trials. These results indicate that PMd neurons in this task are not activated exclusively by a signal proportional to the net color bias of the DCs. They are instead initially modulated by the conflicting evidence supporting both response choices; final target selection may result from a competition between representations of the alternative choices. The results also indicate a temporal overlap between action selection and action initiation processes in PMd and M1.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAssociation LearningChoice BehaviorColorMacaca mulattaMaleMotor CortexNeuronsOrientationPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeStatistics as Topicdecision makingprimary motor cortexreaching

Identifiers

PMID25787952
PMCPMC4461887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.