ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2013
Nasal delivery of fentanyl.
Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacokinetic Characterisation and Comparison of Bioavailability of Intranasal Fentanyl, Transmucosal, and Intravenous Administration through a Three-Way Crossover Study in 24 Healthy Volunteers.Pain research & managementTrial
- Intranasal fentanyl to reduce pain intensity associated with retinopathy of prematurity screening in preterm infants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Safety profile of fentanyl with different routes of administration: a disproportionality analysis using the EudraVigilance database.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fentanyl, a potent opioid analgesic, is rapidly and efficiently absorbed from the nasal cavity, giving significant potential for nasally administered fentanyl to be used in pain management. Many reported clinical studies have used nasally administered IV solution, often as drops, which requires high volumes of solution to deliver an effective dose, resulting in insignificant runoff and drip which, in turn, compromises absorption and efficacy. More recently, products have been developed and commercialised with features intended to overcome these drawbacks, notably delivering the dose as a spray in a lower volume of solution and, for one of the products, incorporating an in situ gelling agent with the aim of both reducing runoff/drip and modifying the fentanyl absorption profile. The commercial fentanyl nasal spray products (PecFent/Lazanda and Instanyl) are currently licensed solely for the treatment of breakthrough pain in cancer patients; they have a number of advantages over oral transmucosal (buccal/sublingual) products used in the same indication, including faster onset of action and easier administration, especially in patients suffering from oral cavity disorders associated with cancer treatment. Given the nature of fentanyl, regulatory agencies will expect that appropriate safety features are incorporated into the primary and secondary packaging in products intended for use by patients in the home and may also impose risk management protocols to control the distribution and prescription of controlled substances. These demands notwithstanding, intranasal fentanyl offers much future promise, including for additional indications and paediatric use.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.