Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25787742›Full record

ReviewDrug delivery and translational research2015

Integration of drug, protein, and gene delivery systems with regenerative medicine.

Elizabeth R Lorden, Howard M Levinson, Kam W Leong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug delivery and translational research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. DNA Vaccines-How Far From Clinical Use?International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  8. When epigenetics meets bioengineering-A material characteristics and surface topography perspective.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genome-editing Technologies for Gene and Cell Therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elizabeth R LordenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, 101 Science Drive, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Howard M Levinson
Kam W Leong

Funding

Interaction of Subchondral Bone and Articular Cartilage System with Skeletal MuscleUH3TR000505 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI TRUSKEY, GEORGE A · 2014 to 2016
$3.6M
Circulatory system and integrated muscle tissue for drug and tissue toxicityUH2TR000505 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI TRUSKEY, GEORGE A · 2012 to 2013
$2.1M
Overcoming Immunosenescence by Nanoparticle-Mediated ActivationR01AI096305 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ABRAHAM, SOMAN N, LEONG, KAM W · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
Non Muscle Myosin II Contractility Putatively Regulates Scar ContractureK08GM085562 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LEVINSON, HOWARD · 2008 to 2012
$713k
Derivation of Functional Neurons from Human Adult Cells by Nonviral Gene DeliveryR21EB015300 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LEONG, KAM W · 2012 to 2013
$421k
NCATS NIH HHS UH2 TR000505NCATS NIH HHS UH2TR000505NCATS NIH HHS UH3 TR000505NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI096305NIBIB NIH HHS EB015000NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB015300NIGMS NIH HHS K08 GM085562
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regenerative medicine has the potential to drastically change the field of health care from reactive to preventative and restorative. Exciting advances in stem cell biology and cellular reprogramming have fueled the progress of this field. Biochemical cues in the form of small molecule drugs, growth factors, zinc finger protein transcription factors and nucleases, transcription activator-like effector nucleases, monoclonal antibodies, plasmid DNA, aptamers, or RNA interference agents can play an important role to influence stem cell differentiation and the outcome of tissue regeneration. Many of these biochemical factors are fragile and must act intracellularly at the molecular level. They require an effective delivery system, which can take the form of a scaffold (e.g., hydrogels and electrospun fibers), carrier (viral and nonviral), nano- and microparticle, or genetically modified cell. In this review, we will discuss the history and current technologies of drug, protein, and gene delivery in the context of regenerative medicine. Next, we will present case examples of how delivery technologies are being applied to promote angiogenesis in nonhealing wounds or prevent angiogenesis in age related macular degeneration. Finally, we will conclude with a brief discussion of the regulatory pathway from bench to bedside for the clinical translation of these novel therapeutics.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsGene Transfer TechniquesAnimalsHumansNucleic AcidsPeptidesPharmaceutical PreparationsProteinsRegenerative MedicineNucleic AcidsPeptidesPharmaceutical PreparationsProteins

Identifiers

PMID25787742
PMCPMC4382089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.