ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2015
Remediation of nitrate-contaminated water by solid-phase denitrification process-a review.
Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advance in the sulfur-based electron donor autotrophic denitrification for nitrate nitrogen removal from wastewater.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2023Review
- Article
- Duckweeds for Phytoremediation of Polluted Water.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Pyrite-Based Autotrophic Denitrifying Microorganisms Derived from Paddy Soils: Effects of Organic Co-Substrate Addition.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Denitrification using permeable reactive barriers with organic substrate or zero-valent iron fillers: controlling mechanisms, challenges, and future perspectives.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Review
- Moving bed biofilm reactor developed with special microbial seed for denitrification of high nitrate containing wastewater.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2021Article
- Review
- Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from wastewater by sand with wheat straw.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019Article
- Nitrate removal from drinking water with a focus on biological methods: a review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019Review
- Evolution of inorganic pollutants from landfills in shallow aquifers of different hydrogeological systems in Lithuania.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018Article
- Article
- Influence of pH, EDTA/Fe(II) ratio, and microbial culture on Fe(II)-mediated autotrophic denitrification.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The paper presents a compilation of various autotrophic and heterotrophic ways of solid-phase denitrification. It covers a complete understanding of various pathways followed during denitrification process. The paper gives a brief review on various governing factors on which the process depends. It focuses mainly on the solid-phase denitrification process, its applicability, efficiency, and disadvantages associated. It presents a critical review on various methodologies associated with denitrification process reported in past years. A comparative study has also been carried out to have a better understanding of advantages and disadvantages of a particular method. We summarize the various organic and inorganic substances and various techniques that have been used for enhancing denitrification process and suggest possible gaps in the research areas whi'ch are worthy of future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25787220What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.