Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25787116›Full record

ArticleZoonoses and public health2015

Household Animal and Human Medicine Use and Animal Husbandry Practices in Rural Bangladesh: Risk Factors for Emerging Zoonotic Disease and Antibiotic Resistance.

A A Roess, P J Winch, A Akhter, D Afroz, N A Ali, R Shah, N Begum, H R Seraji, S El Arifeen, G L Darmstadt and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoonoses and public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Characteristics of NontyphoidAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

A A RoessDepartment of International Health, International Center for Maternal and Newborn Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
P J WinchDepartment of International Health, International Center for Maternal and Newborn Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
A AkhterInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Diseases Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
D AfrozInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Diseases Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
N A AliInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Diseases Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
R ShahInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Diseases Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
N BegumInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Diseases Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
H R SerajiInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Diseases Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
S El ArifeenInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Diseases Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
G L DarmstadtDepartment of International Health, International Center for Maternal and Newborn Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
A H BaquiDepartment of International Health, International Center for Maternal and Newborn Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Bangladesh Projahnmo Study Group
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

PREDOCTORAL FELLOWSHIPS FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIESF31HD041348 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ROESS, AMIRA A · 2001 to 2005
$122k
NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD041348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal antimicrobial use and husbandry practices increase risk of emerging zoonotic disease and antibiotic resistance. We surveyed 700 households to elicit information on human and animal medicine use and husbandry practices. Households that owned livestock (n = 265/459, 57.7%) reported using animal treatments 630 times during the previous 6 months; 57.6% obtained medicines, including antibiotics, from drug sellers. Government animal healthcare providers were rarely visited (9.7%), and respondents more often sought animal health care from pharmacies and village doctors (70.6% and 11.9%, respectively), citing the latter two as less costly and more successful based on past performance. Animal husbandry practices that could promote the transmission of microbes from animals to humans included the following: the proximity of chickens to humans (50.1% of households reported that the chickens slept in the bedroom); the shared use of natural bodies of water for human and animal bathing (78.3%); the use of livestock waste as fertilizer (60.9%); and gender roles that dictate that females are the primary caretakers of poultry and children (62.8%). In the absence of an effective animal healthcare system, villagers must depend on informal healthcare providers for treatment of their animals. Suboptimal use of antimicrobials coupled with unhygienic animal husbandry practices is an important risk factor for emerging zoonotic disease and resistant pathogens.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAnimal DiseasesAnimal HusbandryAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBangladeshChickensChildClinical Trials as TopicCommunicable Diseases, EmergingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHousingHumansAnti-Bacterial Agentsanimal husbandryantibiotic resistance; one healthemerging zoonotic diseaseLivestocknon-human antibiotic use

Identifiers

PMID25787116
PMCPMC4575599
OpenAlexW2028097277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.