Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25786833›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Role of liposome and peptide in the synergistic enhancement of transfection with a lipopolyplex vector.

Mustafa M Munye, Jascindra Ravi, Aristides D Tagalakis, David McCarthy, Maxim G Ryadnov, Stephen L Hart

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular and functional correction of a deep intronic splicing mutation inMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2023
    Article
  3. Peptide-functionalized liposomes as therapeutic and diagnostic tools for cancer treatment.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Liposomal Drug Delivery Systems and Anticancer Drugs.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mustafa M MunyeUCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom.
Jascindra RaviNational Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LW, United Kingdom.
Aristides D TagalakisUCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom.
David McCarthyUCL School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, United Kingdom.
Maxim G RyadnovNational Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LW, United Kingdom.
Stephen L HartUCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBNational Physical Laboratory · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lipopolyplexes are of widespread interest for gene therapy due to their multifunctionality and high transfection efficiencies. Here we compared the biological and biophysical properties of a lipopolyplex formulation with its lipoplex and polyplex equivalents to assess the role of the lipid and peptide components in the formation and function of the lipopolyplex formulation. We show that peptide efficiently packaged plasmid DNA forming spherical, highly cationic nanocomplexes that are taken up efficiently by cells. However, transgene expression was poor, most likely due to endosomal degradation since the polyplex lacks membrane trafficking properties. In addition the strong peptide-DNA interaction may prevent plasmid release from the complex and so limit plasmid DNA availability. Lipid/DNA lipoplexes, on the other hand, produced aggregated masses that showed poorer cellular uptake than the polyplex but contrastingly greater levels of transgene expression. This may be due to the greater ability of lipoplexes relative to polyplexes to promote endosomal escape. Lipopolyplex formulations formed spherical, cationic nanocomplexes with efficient cellular uptake and significantly enhanced transfection efficiency. The lipopolyplexes combined the optimal features of lipoplexes and polyplexes showing optimal cell uptake, endosomal escape and availability of plasmid for transcription, thus explaining the synergistic increase in transfection efficiency.

Indexed as

LiposomesPeptidesCell LineDNAGene ExpressionGenes, ReporterGene Transfer TechniquesHumansNanoparticlesPolymersTransfectionDNALiposomesPeptidesPolymers

Identifiers

PMID25786833
PMCPMC4365389
OpenAlexW1982151061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.