ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2014
In vitro evaluation of polyethylene glycol based microparticles containing azithromycin.
Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objectives of the present investigation are (1) to screen the liquid and solid polyethylene glycol (PEG) molecules able to produce microparticles by cold or hot dispersion method either with or without other excipients, and (2) to evaluate the in vitro activities [like thermodegradation at three different storage conditions, dissolution using a membrane-free dissolution model in artificial tear fluid or phosphate buffer solution of pH 7.4, and zone-inhibition assay using Eschericella coli and red blood cells (RBC) rupturing assay] of azithromycin (AZM)-loaded microparticles in comparison to AZM alone. Adding chitosan and propylene glycol into PEG 6000 led to the formation of spherical-shaped microparticles. Keeping the drug alone in phosphate buffer solution of pH 7.4 at three different storage conditions did show degradation and thus precipitation whereas incorporating the drug into microparticles did not. The microparticles showed a drug release profile that was completely in a retarded style when compared to the release profile of drug alone. The antimicrobial activity of AZM was not affected after incorporating it into microparticles as shown in the zone-inhibition assay. Nevertheless, the microparticles reduced markedly the RBC rupturing property of the drug in comparison to drug in phosphate buffer solution of pH 7.4 (hemolysis percentage values of 27.41 ± 4.1and 43.11 ± 7.6, respectively). This indicates that the microparticles prepared based on PEG, chitosan and propylene glycol could be of a suitable carrier to protect AZM from thermodegradation, to provide retardation in drug release, to preserve antimicrobial activity, and to reduce RBC rupturing effect of the drug.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.