ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2012
Fluorescently labeled microbubbles for facilitating translational molecular ultrasound studies.
Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Ultrasound Imaging Depicts the Modulation of Tumor Angiogenesis by Acetylsalicylic Acid.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Functional micro/nanobubbles for ultrasound medicine and visualizable guidance.Science China. Chemistry · 2021Review
- Drug Loading in Poly(butyl cyanoacrylate)-Based Polymeric Microbubbles.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2020Article
- PBCA-based polymeric microbubbles for molecular imaging and drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2017Article
- Evolution of contrast agents for ultrasound imaging and ultrasound-mediated drug delivery.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2015Review
- Recent advances in molecular, multimodal and theranostic ultrasound imaging.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbubbles (MB) are routinely used as contrast agents for functional and molecular ultrasound (US) imaging. For molecular US imaging, MB are functionalized with antibodies or peptides, in order to visualize receptor expression by angiogenic or inflamed endothelium. In general, initial in vitro binding studies with targeted MB are performed using phase contrast microscopy. Difficulties in the identification of MB in standard phase contrast microscopy, however, generally result in high variability, high observer dependency, and low reproducibility. To overcome these shortcomings, we here describe a simple post-loading strategy for labeling polymer-based MB with fluorophores, and we show that the use of rhodamine-loaded MB in combination with fluorescence microscopy substantially reduces the variability and the observer dependency of in vitro binding studies. In addition, we demonstrate that rhodamine-loaded MB can also be used for in vivo and ex vivo experimental setups, e.g., for analyzing MB binding to inflamed carotids using two-photon laser scanning microscopy, and for validating the binding of VEGFR2-targeted MB to tumor endothelium. These findings demonstrate that fluorescently labeled MB substantially facilitate translational molecular US studies, and they suggest that a similar synthetic strategy can be exploited for preparing drug-loaded MB, to enable image-guided, targeted, and triggered drug delivery to tumors and to sites of inflammation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.