Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25786247›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Use of smokeless tobacco by Indian women aged 18-40 years during pregnancy and reproductive years.

Saritha Nair, Jean J Schensul, Shahina Begum, Mangesh S Pednekar, Cheryl Oncken, Sameena M Bilgi, Achhelal R Pasi, Balaiah Donta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Repercussions of Smokeless Tobacco on Buccal Mucosa: A Community Based Observational Study at a Tertiary Care Centre in Western Rajasthan.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Saritha NairNational Institute of Medical Statistics, New Delhi, India.
Jean J SchensulInstitute for Community Research, Hartford, Connecticut, United States of America.
Shahina BegumNational Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Mumbai, India.
Mangesh S PednekarHealis Sekhsaria Institute for Public Health, Mumbai, India.
Cheryl OnckenUniversity of Connecticut, Mansfield, Connecticut, United States of America.
Sameena M BilgiNational Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Mumbai, India.
Achhelal R PasiNational Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Mumbai, India.
Balaiah DontaNational Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Mumbai, India.

Funding

Smokeless Tobacco Use and Reproductive Health Among Married Women in a Low-incomeR03TW008350 · FIC · INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITY RESEARCH · PI SCHENSUL, JEAN J · 2009 to 2011
$173k
FIC NIH HHS 1R03TW008350-01FIC NIH HHS R03 TW008350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis paper discusses patterns of daily smokeless tobacco (SLT) use and correlates of poly SLT use among married women aged 18-40 years in a Mumbai slum community with implications for tobacco control.

methodsUsing a mixed methods approach, the study included a structured survey with 409 daily SLT users and in-depth interviews with 42 women. Participants for the survey were selected using a systematic sampling procedure (one woman in every fourth eligible household). Univariate and bivariate analysis, and multiple logistic regressions were conducted to identify demographic and social factors associated with women's use of poly SLT products. To illustrate survey results, in-depth interviews were analyzed using Atlas ti software.

resultsSixty-four percent of the women surveyed used only one type of SLT; of these, 30% used mishri, 32% used pan with tobacco and the rest used chewed tobacco (11%), gul (17%) or gutkha (10%). Thirty-six percent used more than one type of SLT. Poly SLT users chewed or rubbed 50% more tobacco as compared to single users (mean consumption of tobacco per day: 9.54 vs. 6.49 grams; p<0.001). Women were more likely to be poly SLT users if they were illiterate as compared to literate (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.07-2.71), if they had lived in Mumbai for 10 years or more, versus less than ten years (AOR=1.67, 95% CI=1.03-2.71); and if their husband was a poly SLT user as compared to a non SLT user (AOR=2.78, 95% CI=1.63-4.76). No differences were noted between pregnant and non-pregnant women in SLT consumption patterns.

conclusionsTobacco control policies and programs must focus specifically on both social context and use patterns to address SLT use among women of reproductive age with special attention to poly SLT users, an understudied and vulnerable population.

Indexed as

CitiesAdultDemographyFemaleHumansIndiaInterviews as TopicLiteracyLogistic ModelsOdds RatioPoverty AreasPregnancyTobacco, SmokelessTobacco Use

Identifiers

PMID25786247
PMCPMC4364978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.