Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25786241›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Genetic analysis of the CDI pathway from Burkholderia pseudomallei 1026b.

Sanna Koskiniemi, Fernando Garza-Sánchez, Natasha Edman, Swarnava Chaudhuri, Stephen J Poole, Colin Manoil, Christopher S Hayes, David A Low

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition in Bacteria: Do Not Get Too Close!International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Contact-dependent interbacterial toxins deliver a message.Current opinion in microbiology · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sanna KoskiniemiDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Fernando Garza-SánchezDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Natasha EdmanDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Swarnava ChaudhuriDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Stephen J PooleDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Colin ManoilDepartment of Genome Sciences, Box 355065, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Christopher S HayesDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America; Biomolecular Science and Engineering Program, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
David A LowDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America; Biomolecular Science and Engineering Program, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
University of California, Santa Barbara · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Vaccines and Diagnostics TrialsU54AI065359 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI BARBOUR, ALAN G. · 2005 to 2013
$88.8M
Structure-function analysis of polymorphic CDI toxin-immunity protein complexes aU01GM102318 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI GOULDING, CELIA · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI065359NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM102318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) is a mode of inter-bacterial competition mediated by the CdiB/CdiA family of two-partner secretion systems. CdiA binds to receptors on susceptible target bacteria, then delivers a toxin domain derived from its C-terminus. Studies with Escherichia coli suggest the existence of multiple CDI growth-inhibition pathways, whereby different systems exploit distinct target-cell proteins to deliver and activate toxins. Here, we explore the CDI pathway in Burkholderia using the CDIIIBp1026b system encoded on chromosome II of Burkholderia pseudomallei 1026b as a model. We took a genetic approach and selected Burkholderia thailandensis E264 mutants that are resistant to growth inhibition by CDIIIBp1026b. We identified mutations in three genes, BTH_I0359, BTH_II0599, and BTH_I0986, each of which confers resistance to CDIIIBp1026b. BTH_I0359 encodes a small peptide of unknown function, whereas BTH_II0599 encodes a predicted inner membrane transport protein of the major facilitator superfamily. The inner membrane localization of BTH_II0599 suggests that it may facilitate translocation of CdiA-CTIIBp1026b toxin from the periplasm into the cytoplasm of target cells. BTH_I0986 encodes a putative transglycosylase involved in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) synthesis. ∆BTH_I0986 mutants have altered LPS structure and do not interact with CDI⁺ inhibitor cells to the same extent as BTH_I0986⁺ cells, suggesting that LPS could function as a receptor for CdiAIIBp1026b. Although ∆BTH_I0359, ∆BTH_II0599, and ∆BTH_I0986 mutations confer resistance to CDIIIBp1026b, they provide no protection against the CDIE264 system deployed by B. thailandensis E264. Together, these findings demonstrate that CDI growth-inhibition pathways are distinct and can differ significantly even between closely related species.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, BacterialGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenes, BacterialAmino Acid SequenceBacterial AdhesionBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBacterial Secretion SystemsBacterial ToxinsBurkholderia pseudomalleiContact InhibitionCytoplasmEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsLipopolysaccharidesMembrane ProteinsMembrane Transport ProteinsBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBacterial Secretion SystemsBacterial ToxinsBamA protein, E coliCdiA protein, E coliCdiB protein, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsLipopolysaccharidesMembrane ProteinsMembrane Transport Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25786241
PMCPMC4364669
OpenAlexW2060619274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.