Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25785967›Full record

Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2015

Clindamycin versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for uncomplicated skin infections.

Loren G Miller, Robert S Daum, C Buddy Creech, David Young, Michele D Downing, Samantha J Eells, Stephanie Pettibone, Rebecca J Hoagland, Henry F Chambers, DMID 07-0051 Team

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00730028 (Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Clindamycin, Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole, or Placebo for Uncomplicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections Caused by Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus), which is not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00730028 phase2completednot on this map

Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Clindamycin, Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole, or Placebo for Uncomplicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections Caused by Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Ran2009 to 2015Enrolled1,310ConditionsStaphylococcal InfectionArmsTrimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, Placebo, Clindamycin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 192 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Newer glycopeptide antibiotics for treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections: systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost analysis.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. A Randomized Trial of Clindamycin Versus Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for Uncomplicated Wound Infection.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Trial
  7. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Treatment of MRSA Infection: Where are We?Current medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Clinical Impact ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Antibiotic susceptibility and clonal distribution ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Loren G MillerFrom the Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute (L.G.M., S.J.E.) and Division of Infectious Diseases, Harbor-UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) Medical Center (L.G.M., S.J.E.), Torrance, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles (L.G.M., S.J.E.), Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) (D.Y.), and Division of Infectious Diseases, San Francisco General Hospital and UCSF (M.D.D., H.F.C.), San Francisco - all in California; Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of Chicago, Chicago (R.S.D.); Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University, Nashville (C.B.C.); the EMMES Corporation, Rockville, MD (S.P.); and Cota Enterprises, Meriden, KS (R.J.H.).
Robert S Daum
C Buddy Creech
David Young
Michele D Downing
Samantha J Eells
Stephanie Pettibone
Rebecca J Hoagland
Henry F Chambers
DMID 07-0051 Team
San Francisco General Hospital · USEmmes (United States) · USUCLA Medical Center · USUniversity of California San Francisco Medical Center · USUniversity of Chicago · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
UCLA CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTEUL1RR033176 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2011 to 2011
$15.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000124NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR033176NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR033176NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200700031CPHS HHS HHSN272200700031C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkin and skin-structure infections are common in ambulatory settings. However, the efficacy of various antibiotic regimens in the era of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is unclear.

methodsWe enrolled outpatients with uncomplicated skin infections who had cellulitis, abscesses larger than 5 cm in diameter (smaller for younger children), or both. Patients were enrolled at four study sites. All abscesses underwent incision and drainage. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either clindamycin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) for 10 days. Patients and investigators were unaware of the treatment assignments and microbiologic test results. The primary outcome was clinical cure 7 to 10 days after the end of treatment.

resultsA total of 524 patients were enrolled (264 in the clindamycin group and 260 in the TMP-SMX group), including 155 children (29.6%). One hundred sixty patients (30.5%) had an abscess, 280 (53.4%) had cellulitis, and 82 (15.6%) had mixed infection, defined as at least one abscess lesion and one cellulitis lesion. S. aureus was isolated from the lesions of 217 patients (41.4%); the isolates in 167 (77.0%) of these patients were MRSA. The proportion of patients cured was similar in the two treatment groups in the intention-to-treat population (80.3% in the clindamycin group and 77.7% in the TMP-SMX group; difference, -2.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -10.2 to 4.9; P=0.52) and in the populations of patients who could be evaluated (466 patients; 89.5% in the clindamycin group and 88.2% in the TMP-SMX group; difference, -1.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.6 to 5.1; P=0.77). Cure rates did not differ significantly between the two treatments in the subgroups of children, adults, and patients with abscess versus cellulitis. The proportion of patients with adverse events was similar in the two groups.

conclusionsWe found no significant difference between clindamycin and TMP-SMX, with respect to either efficacy or side-effect profile, for the treatment of uncomplicated skin infections, including both cellulitis and abscesses. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00730028.).

Indexed as

AbscessAdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCellulitisChildChild, PreschoolClindamycinDouble-Blind MethodDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansInfantMaleSkin Diseases, BacterialTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug CombinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsClindamycinDrug CombinationsTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination

Identifiers

PMID25785967
PMCPMC4547538
OpenAlexW2152531952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.