Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25785938›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2015

Mother and offspring in conflict: why not?

Francisco Úbeda, Andy Gardner

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Sexual selection modulates genetic conflicts and patterns of genomic imprinting.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2017
    Article
  6. Intrafamily and intragenomic conflicts in human warfare.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Francisco ÚbedaSchool of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, United Kingdom.
Andy GardnerSchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A gene mediating interactions between mouse mothers and their pups has recently been claimed to support coadaptation rather than the kinship theory of genomic imprinting. This Formal Comment argues that this claim is unfounded.

Indexed as

AnimalsBody SizeFemaleGRB10 Adaptor ProteinGRB10 Adaptor Protein

Identifiers

PMID25785938
PMCPMC4364986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.