ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2015
Toxicity mechanisms identification via gene set enrichment analysis of time-series toxicogenomics data: impact of time and concentration.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3' RNA-seq is superior to standard RNA-seq in cases of sparse data but inferior at identifying toxicity pathways in a model organism.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Analyses of Transcriptomics Cell Signalling for Pre-Screening Applications in the Integrated Approach for Testing and Assessment of Non-Genotoxic Carcinogens.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Transcriptomic analyses of livers from mice exposed to 1,4-dioxane for up to 90 days to assess potential mode(s) of action underlying liver tumor development.Current research in toxicology · 2021Article
- Assessment of the Mode of Action Underlying the Effects of GenX in Mouse Liver and Implications for Assessing Human Health Risks.Toxicologic pathology · 2020Article
- An integrative method for identification and prioritization of constituents of concern in produced water from onshore oil and gas extraction.Environment international · 2020Article
- Arsenic Reduces Gene Expression Response to Changing Salinity in Killifish.Environmental science & technology · 2018Article
- Article
- Representing high throughput expression profiles via perturbation barcodes reveals compound targets.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- The Use of Omic Technologies Applied to Traditional Chinese Medicine Research.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The advance in high-throughput "toxicogenomics" technologies, which allows for concurrent monitoring of cellular responses globally upon exposure to chemical toxicants, presents promises for next-generation toxicity assessment. It is recognized that cellular responses to toxicants have a highly dynamic nature, and exhibit both temporal complexity and dose-response shifts. Most current gene enrichment or pathway analysis lack the recognition of the inherent correlation within time series data, and may potentially miss important pathways or yield biased and inconsistent results that ignore dynamic patterns and time-sensitivity. In this study, we investigated the application of two score metrics for GSEA (gene set enrichment analysis) to rank the genes that consider the temporal gene expression profile. One applies a novel time series CPCA (common principal components analysis) to generate scores for genes based on their contributions to the common temporal variation among treatments for a given chemical at different concentrations. Another one employs an integrated altered gene expression quantifier-TELI (transcriptional effect level index) that integrates altered gene expression magnitude over the exposure time. By comparing the GSEA results using two different ranking metrics for examining the dynamic responses of reporter cells treated with various dose levels of three model toxicants, mitomycin C, hydrogen peroxide, and lead nitrate, the analysis identified and revealed different toxicity mechanisms of these chemicals that exhibit chemical-specific, as well as time-aware and dose-sensitive nature. The ability, advantages, and disadvantages of varying ranking metrics were discussed. These findings support the notion that toxicity bioassays should account for the cells' complex dynamic responses, thereby implying that both data acquisition and data analysis should look beyond simple traditional end point responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.