Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25785649›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2015

Toxicity mechanisms identification via gene set enrichment analysis of time-series toxicogenomics data: impact of time and concentration.

Ce Gao, David Weisman, Jiaqi Lan, Na Gou, April Z Gu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Use of Omic Technologies Applied to Traditional Chinese Medicine Research.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ce Gao†Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
David Weisman‡Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts 02125, United States.
Jiaqi Lan†Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
Na Gou†Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
April Z Gu†Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.

Funding

Research Experiences and Training Coordination CoreP42ES017198 · NIEHS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI ALSHAWABKEH, AKRAM N · 2010 to 2024
$38.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES017198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advance in high-throughput "toxicogenomics" technologies, which allows for concurrent monitoring of cellular responses globally upon exposure to chemical toxicants, presents promises for next-generation toxicity assessment. It is recognized that cellular responses to toxicants have a highly dynamic nature, and exhibit both temporal complexity and dose-response shifts. Most current gene enrichment or pathway analysis lack the recognition of the inherent correlation within time series data, and may potentially miss important pathways or yield biased and inconsistent results that ignore dynamic patterns and time-sensitivity. In this study, we investigated the application of two score metrics for GSEA (gene set enrichment analysis) to rank the genes that consider the temporal gene expression profile. One applies a novel time series CPCA (common principal components analysis) to generate scores for genes based on their contributions to the common temporal variation among treatments for a given chemical at different concentrations. Another one employs an integrated altered gene expression quantifier-TELI (transcriptional effect level index) that integrates altered gene expression magnitude over the exposure time. By comparing the GSEA results using two different ranking metrics for examining the dynamic responses of reporter cells treated with various dose levels of three model toxicants, mitomycin C, hydrogen peroxide, and lead nitrate, the analysis identified and revealed different toxicity mechanisms of these chemicals that exhibit chemical-specific, as well as time-aware and dose-sensitive nature. The ability, advantages, and disadvantages of varying ranking metrics were discussed. These findings support the notion that toxicity bioassays should account for the cells' complex dynamic responses, thereby implying that both data acquisition and data analysis should look beyond simple traditional end point responses.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationTranscriptomeAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAnti-Infective Agents, LocalDose-Response Relationship, DrugEnvironmental PollutantsEscherichia coli K12Hazardous SubstancesHydrogen PeroxideLeadMicroarray AnalysisMitomycinNitratesPrincipal Component AnalysisToxicogeneticsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAnti-Infective Agents, LocalEnvironmental PollutantsHazardous SubstancesHydrogen PeroxideLeadlead nitrateMitomycinNitrates

Identifiers

PMID25785649
PMCPMC6321746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.