Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25785493›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology2015

Simultaneous inference of cancer pathways and tumor progression from cross-sectional mutation data.

Benjamin J Raphael, Fabio Vandin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Inferring tumor progression in large datasets.PLoS computational biology · 2020
    Article
  5. Modelling cancer progression using Mutual Hazard Networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Computational approaches for the identification of cancer genes and pathways.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benjamin J Raphael1Department of Computer Science and Center for Computational Molecular Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Fabio Vandin1Department of Computer Science and Center for Computational Molecular Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Funding

Computational Characterization of Genetic HeterogeneityR01HG007069 · NHGRI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI RAPHAEL, BENJAMIN · 2013 to 2015
$1.1M
Analytical Approaches to Massive Data Computation with Applications to GenomicsR01CA180776 · NCI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI RAPHAEL, BENJAMIN, UPFAL, ELIEZER · 2013 to 2016
$283k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA180776NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent cancer sequencing studies provide a wealth of somatic mutation data from a large number of patients. One of the most intriguing and challenging questions arising from this data is to determine whether the temporal order of somatic mutations in a cancer follows any common progression. Since we usually obtain only one sample from a patient, such inferences are commonly made from cross-sectional data from different patients. This analysis is complicated by the extensive variation in the somatic mutations across different patients, variation that is reduced by examining combinations of mutations in various pathways. Thus far, methods to reconstruct tumor progression at the pathway level have restricted attention to known, a priori defined pathways. In this work we show how to simultaneously infer pathways and the temporal order of their mutations from cross-sectional data, leveraging on the exclusivity property of driver mutations within a pathway. We define the pathway linear progression model, and derive a combinatorial formulation for the problem of finding the optimal model from mutation data. We show that with enough samples the optimal solution to this problem uniquely identifies the correct model with high probability even when errors are present in the mutation data. We then formulate the problem as an integer linear program (ILP), which allows the analysis of datasets from recent studies with large numbers of samples. We use our algorithm to analyze somatic mutation data from three cancer studies, including two studies from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) on large number of samples on colorectal cancer and glioblastoma. The models reconstructed with our method capture most of the current knowledge of the progression of somatic mutations in these cancer types, while also providing new insights on the tumor progression at the pathway level.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsColorectal NeoplasmsComputational BiologyCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, GeneticDisease ProgressionGlioblastomaHumansModels, GeneticMutationSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID25785493
PMCPMC4449706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.