Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25785456›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Detection of EML4-ALK in lung adenocarcinoma using pleural effusion with FISH, IHC, and RT-PCR methods.

Leilei Liu, Ping Zhan, Xiaodie Zhou, Yong Song, Xiaojun Zhou, Like Yu, Jiandong Wang

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Characteristics of fusion genes in breast cancer.Cancer cell international · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [A Case of EML4-ALK Fusion V1 Subtype Lung Adenocarcinoma 
Detected by RNA-based NGS].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Testing: IHC vs. FISH vs. NGS.Current treatment options in oncology · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Leilei LiuDepartment of Pathology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Ping ZhanDepartment of Medicine, Nanjing Thoracic Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Xiaodie ZhouDepartment of Pathology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Yong SongDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Xiaojun ZhouDepartment of Pathology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Like YuDepartment of Medicine, Nanjing Thoracic Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Jiandong WangDepartment of Pathology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing University · CNNanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command · CNNanjing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4) gene rearrangements occur in approximately 5% of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC), leading to the overexpression of anaplastic lymphoma kinase and predicting a response to the targeted inhibitor, crizotinib. Malignant pleural effusion occurs in most patients with advanced lung cancer, especially adenocarcinoma, and tissue samples are not always available from these patients. We attempted to clarify the feasibility of detecting the EML4-ALK fusion gene in pleural effusion cells using different methods. We obtained 66 samples of pleural effusion from NSCLC patients. The pleural effusion fluid was centrifuged, and the cellular components obtained were formalin fixed and paraffin embedded. The EML4-ALK fusion gene status was determined with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and immunohistochemistry (IHC). EML4-ALK was detected in three of 66 patient samples (4.5%) with RT-PCR. When the RT-PCR data were used as the standard, one false positive and one false negative samples were identified with IHC; and one false negative sample was identified with FISH. These results suggest that a block of pleural effusion cells can be used to detect the EML4-ALK fusion gene. IHC had good sensitivity, but low specificity. FISH had low sensitivity, but high specificity. RT-PCR is a good candidate method for detecting EML4-ALK in blocks of pleural effusion cells from lung cancer patients.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedOncogene Proteins, FusionPleural Effusion, MalignantReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionEML4-ALK fusion protein, humanOncogene Proteins, Fusion

Identifiers

PMID25785456
PMCPMC4364974
OpenAlexW2071901887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.