Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25785286›Full record

ReviewTheScientificWorldJournal2015

Penile rehabilitation after pelvic cancer surgery.

Fouad Aoun, Alexandre Peltier, Roland van Velthoven

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in TheScientificWorldJournal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Sexual rehabilitation recommendations for prostate cancer survivors and their partners from a biopsychosocial Prostate Cancer Supportive Care Program.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fouad AounDepartment of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, 1 Héger-Bordet Street, 1000 Brussels, Belgium ; Université Libre de Bruxelles, 50 Franklin Roosevelt Avenue, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Alexandre PeltierDepartment of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, 1 Héger-Bordet Street, 1000 Brussels, Belgium ; Université Libre de Bruxelles, 50 Franklin Roosevelt Avenue, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Roland van VelthovenDepartment of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, 1 Héger-Bordet Street, 1000 Brussels, Belgium ; Université Libre de Bruxelles, 50 Franklin Roosevelt Avenue, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Institut Jules Bordet · BEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Erectile dysfunction is the most common complication after pelvic radical surgery. Rehabilitation programs are increasingly being used in clinical practice but there is no high level of evidence supporting its efficacy. The principle of early penile rehabilitation stems from animal studies showing early histological and molecular changes associated with penile corporal hypoxia after cavernous nerve injury. The concept of early penile rehabilitation was developed in late nineties with a subsequent number of clinical studies supporting early pharmacologic penile rehabilitation. These studies included all available phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, intracavernosal injection and intraurethral use of prostaglandin E1 and to lesser extent vacuum erectile devices. However, these studies are of small number, difficult to interpret, and often with no control group. Furthermore, no studies have proven an in vivo derangement of endothelial or smooth muscle cell metabolism secondary to a prolonged flaccid state. The purpose of the present report is a synthetic overview of the literature in order to analyze the concept and the rationale of rehabilitation program of erectile dysfunction following radical pelvic surgery and the evidence of such programs in clinical practice. Emphasis will be placed on penile rehabilitation programs after radical cystoprostatectomy, radical prostatectomy, and rectal cancer treatment. Future perspectives are also analyzed.

Indexed as

AlprostadilAnimalsErectile DysfunctionHumansMalePelvic NeoplasmsPenisPhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsPostoperative ComplicationsProstatectomyRectal NeoplasmsRisk FactorsUrologic Surgical ProceduresAlprostadilPhosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID25785286
PMCPMC4345049
OpenAlexW2014283108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.