ArticleIranian journal of radiology : a quarterly journal published by the Iranian Radiological Society2015
Comparison of the efficacy of conventional echocardiographic parameters in the diagnosis of significant coronary artery stenosis.
Article in Iranian journal of radiology : a quarterly journal published by the Iranian Radiological Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor diagnosis of significant coronary artery stenosis, the most accurate parameter among the conventional echocardiographic parameters remains unknown.
objectivesTo assess the diagnostic efficacy of conventional echocardiographic parameters in the diagnosis of significant coronary artery stenosis and their correlation with the percentage of stenosis considering conventional coronary angiography as gold standard. PATIENTS AND
methodsSeventy eight individuals were included in the study. The three echocardiographic parameters including the coronary sinus flow [flow (mL/minute)], the global left ventricular perfusion by dividing the coronary sinus flow by left ventricular mass [flow/LVM (mL/minute)] and the difference between the left ventricular mass at end diastole and peak systole using area-length calculation methods [LV (d-s) mass A-L] were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for their accuracy to distinguish between normal subjects and patients with significant (> 50%) coronary artery disease (CAD).
resultsFlow (mL/minute), flow/LVM (mL/minuteg) and LV (d-s) mass A-L all correlated significantly with the percentage of stenosis (r = -0.64, P < 0.001; r = -0.47, P < 0.001; r = -0.56, P < 0.001, respectively). With the use of the percentage of stenosis > 50% as the criteria to distinguish patients with or without CAD, the areas under the ROC curve for flow (mL/minute) were 0.75, while they were 0.57 for flow/LVM (mL/minuteg) and 0.59 for LV (d-s) mass A-L. The percentage of stenosis > 70% was best detected by coronary sinus flow < 198 mL/minute (sensitivity, 81.35%; specificity, 70.37%; positive predictive value, 63.63%; negative predictive value, 86.36% and accuracy, 75%; P < 0.001).
conclusionsThe coronary sinus flow per minute is the most accurate parameter among the three echocardiographic parameters mentioned above for the assessment of significant stenosis of the coronary artery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.