ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Treatment of acutely ruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms using self-expanding stent.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety of stent-assisted coiling for the treatment of wide-necked ruptured aneurysm: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of prevalence.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2020Pooled it
- One-stage Stent-assisted Coil Embolization for Rupture-side-unknown Bilateral Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms in an Acute Stage: A Case Report.NMC case report journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of self-expanding stent in treatment of acutely ruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms in the acute stage.
methodTreatment of 38 patients with self-expanding stent was retrospectively analyzed.
resultsFrom January 2009 to May 2014, a total of 38 patients with 44 acutely ruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms were embolized with self-expanding stents at our center. Immediate post-operative imaging demonstrated that the aneurysms were densely packed in 17 patients, subtotally embolized in 2 patients, and subtotally embolized with residual aneurysm necks in 19 patients. At discharge, the patients were assessed for prognosis and the results revealed nerve dysfunction in 3 patients (7.9%), coma in 6 patients (15.8%), hospital death in 1 case (2.6%). Twenty-eight (73.7%) patients were asymptomatic at discharge. Ten of the 38 patients were followed up by angiography for a period of 3.7 months on average, which showed complete occlusion in 9 patients (90%), remnant aneurysm necks in 1 patient (10%), and no recanalization was observed in all the followed-up patients. Stent related complications also were recorded.
conclusionStent-assisted coiling is effective in treating acutely ruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. Angiographic investigation and clinical follow-up is needed for evaluation of long-term clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25785122PMC4358577What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.