ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Elevated red blood cell distribution width in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients with metabolic syndrome.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel nomogram predicting the risk of positive biopsy for patients in the diagnostic gray area of prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Complement 3 and metabolic syndrome induced by clozapine: a cross-sectional study and retrospective cohort analysis.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2017Article
- The Effect of Different Metabolic Syndrome: Definitions on the Relationship Between Metabolic Syndrome and LUTS in Men With Benign Prostatic Enlargement.American journal of men's health · 2017Article
- Red cell distribution width is a novel biomarker that predicts excess body-mass index loss 1 year after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Red blood distribution width (RDW) is a novel prognostic marker that reflects oxidative stress and inflammation in patients. Chronic inflammation has been proposed as a candidate mechanism between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and metabolic syndrome (MetS). However, the relationship between RDW and MetS in BPH patients is unclear. Men aged 50 year-old or older with BPH were recruited into the study. The BPH patients were classified as MetS group and non-MetS group. 69 patients without BPH and MetS were as the control group. The clinical information and RDW were measured to identify their relationship. MetS was diagnosed in 34% of the patients. The RDW values were found to be higher in the BPH group than in the control group [(13.3 ± 0.8) vs. (12.6 ± 0.8), P < 0.001]. The total prostate volume (TPV) and post void residual (PVR) urine volume were significantly higher in subject with MetS than in non-MetS and related with the number of metabolic abnormalities. High serum triglyceride and low serum high- density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels were significantly associated with TPV even adjusting for age (adjusted r = 0.373, P < 0.001, and adjusted r = -0.425, P < 0.001, respectively).There was a significant correlation between RDW and TPV (r = 0.370, P < 0.001), Body mass index (BMI) (r = 0.367, P < 0.001) and MetS (r = 0.276, P < 0.001). The data indicated that RDW was independently correlated with the presence of MetS (odd ratio 1.226, 95% confidence intervals 0.89-1.87, P < 0.001). MetS is associated with BPH development in men. The RDW level is significantly higher in patients with BPH than that in control. RDW is an independent predictor of MetS in BPH patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25785115PMC4358570W116810995What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.