ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluating the severity of Crohn's disease.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ultrasound criteria for transmural healing and response in Crohn's disease: a systematic review of definitions and thresholds.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Intestinal Ultrasound: Envisioning a New Future for Crohn's Disease Management.ACG case reports journal · 2024Article
- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for the Evaluation of Crohn's Disease in Pediatric Patients.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Article
- Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the pediatric bowel.Pediatric radiology · 2021Review
- Correlation between ultrasound consolidated score and simple endoscopic score for determining the activity of Crohn's disease.The British journal of radiology · 2020Article
- Diagnostic Value of Conventional Ultrasonography Combined with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) 3 and 4 Thyroid Micronodules.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the value of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in determining the severity of active Crohn's disease.
methodsThirty-seven patients who were considered to be in active period of Crohn's disease were included. Conventional ultrasound was employed to measure the thicknesses of interior, exterior and the whole bowel walls. Qualitative and quantitative CEUS analysis of the interior, exterior and the whole intestinal walls were also performed. Correlations between these methods and the severity of Crohn's disease were assessed.
resultsEndoscopy grading system identified 19 patients with mild disease and 18 with severe disease. In discriminating severe Crohn's disease from mild disease, the cut-off value for the thickness of the entire bowel wall was 6.8 mm by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, with area under ROC (AUROC) of 0.84, sensitivity of 94.4%, specificity of 68.4%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 61.1%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 69.2%, and Youden's index of 0.628. The cut-off value for thickness of the interior intestinal wall was 4.8 mm (AUROC, 0.81; sensitivity, 88.9%; specificity, 63.2%; PPV, 85.7%; NPV, 69.6%; Youden's index, 0.521). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and Youden's index of CEUS qualitative analysis were 100% (18/18), 57.9% (11/19), 64.3% (18/26), 100% (11/11), 78.4% (29/37), and 0.579, respectively. Quantitative comparison revealed that patients with mild disease and those with severe disease differed only in Imax of inner bowel wall enhancement (2746.9 ± 911 vs. 12814.5 ± 9802.4; P = 0.02) and Imax of entire wall enhancement (2106 ± 660 vs. 9864 ± 6994; P = 0.03). The cut-off value for the Imax of the entire bowel wall was 3067, with the AUROC of 0.96, sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 67.7%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 88.9%, and Youden's index of 0.677; and the cut-off value for the Imax of the interior intestinal layer was 3356, with the AUROC of 1.00, sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 100%, and Youden's index of 1.0.
conclusionsBoth conventional ultrasound and CEUS are reliable methods in determining the severity of active Crohn's disease. The diagnostic performance in terms of Youden's index was highest for the Imax of the interior layer, in comparison with all other features on conventional ultrasound, qualitative CEUS, and quantitative CEUS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25784981PMC4358436What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.