Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25784897›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2015

Extending injury- and disease-resistant CNS phenotypes by repetitive epigenetic conditioning.

Jeffrey M Gidday

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Conditioning-based therapeutics for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage - A critical review.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Developmental exposure to ΔGeroScience · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Aging circadian rhythms and cannabinoids.Neurobiology of aging · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. How does hormesis impact biology, toxicology, and medicine?NPJ aging and mechanisms of disease · 2017
    Review
  15. Heterogeneity of B Cell Functions in Stroke-Related Risk, Prevention, Injury, and Repair.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Enhancing and Extending Biological Performance and Resilience.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jeffrey M GiddayDepartment of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine , St. Louis, MO , USA ; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine , St. Louis, MO , USA ; Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine , St. Louis, MO , USA.

Funding

WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER VISION RESEARCHP30EY002687 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Philip Raymond Williams · 1985 to 2026
$18.4M
Washington University Center for Translational NeuroscienceP30NS057105 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HOLTZMAN, DAVID M. · 2006 to 2011
$8.7M
ENDOGENOUS NEUROPROTECTION IN GLAUCOMAR01EY018607 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GIDDAY, JEFFREY M · 2008 to 2018
$2.8M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY002687NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018607NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS057105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant reductions in the extent of acute injury in the CNS can be achieved by exposure to different preconditioning stimuli, but the duration of the induced protective phenotype is typically short-lasting, and thus is deemed as limiting its clinical applicability. Extending the period over which such adaptive epigenetic changes persist - in effect, expanding conditioning's "therapeutic window" - would significantly broaden the potential applications of such a treatment approach in patients. The frequency of the conditioning stimulus may hold the key. While transient (1-3 days) protection against CNS ischemic injury is well established preclinically following a single preconditioning stimulus, repetitively presenting preconditioning stimuli extends the duration of ischemic tolerance by many weeks. Moreover, repetitive intermittent postconditioning enhances post-ischemic recovery metrics and improves long-term survival. Intermittent conditioning is also efficacious for preventing or delaying injury in preclinical models of chronic neurodegenerative disease, and for promoting long-lasting functional improvements in a number of other pathologies as well. Although the detailed mechanisms underlying these protracted kinds of neuroplasticity remain largely unstudied, accumulating empirical evidence supports the contention that all of these adaptive phenotypes are epigenetically mediated. Going forward, additional preclinical demonstrations of the ability to induce sustained beneficial phenotypes that reduce the burden of acute and chronic neurodegeneration, and experimental interrogations of the regulatory constructs responsible for these epigenetic responses, will accelerate the identification of not only efficacious but also practical, adaptive epigenetics-based treatments for individuals with neurological disease.

Indexed as

epigeneticsneuroprotectionpostconditioningpreconditioningretinastroke

Identifiers

PMID25784897
PMCPMC4345883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.