ArticleSarcoma2015
Wiki-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of adult onset sarcoma: a new paradigm in sarcoma evidence.
Article in Sarcoma, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Do Patients Treated With an Unplanned Resection for Small Superficial Soft Tissue Sarcomas Have Worse Long-term Survival Than Those Initially Treated With an Oncologic Resection?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2024Article
- Clinician Adherence to Inflammatory Bowel Disease Guidelines: Results of a Qualitative Study of Barriers and Enablers.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2023Article
- Clinical practice guideline adherence in oncology: A qualitative study of insights from clinicians in Australia.PloS one · 2022Article
- "We're on a Merry-Go-Round": Reflections of Patients and Carers after Completing Treatment for Sarcoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Article
- The development and evaluation of an online educational tool for the evidence-based management of neck pain by chiropractic teaching faculty.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2021Article
- Nurses' Use and Ways of Understanding Web-Based National Guidelines for Child Healthcare.Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN · 2020Article
- Information and Communication Technologies for the Dissemination of Clinical Practice Guidelines to Health Professionals: A Systematic Review.JMIR medical education · 2016Review
- Development and usage of wiki-based software for point-of-care emergency medical information.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016Article
- Wiki-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of adult onset sarcoma: a new paradigm in sarcoma evidence.Sarcoma · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2013 Australia introduced Wiki-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Adult Onset Sarcoma. These guidelines utilized a customized MediaWiki software application for guideline development and are the first evidence-based guidelines for clinical management of sarcoma. This paper presents our experience with developing and implementing web-based interactive guidelines and reviews some of the challenges and lessons from adopting an evidence-based (rather than consensus-based) approach to clinical sarcoma guidelines. Digital guidelines can be easily updated with new evidence, continuously reviewed and widely disseminated. They provide an accessible method of enabling clinicians and consumers to access evidence-based clinical practice recommendations and, as evidenced by over 2000 views in the first four months after release, with 49% of those visits being from countries outside of Australia. The lessons learned have relevance to other rare cancers in addition to the international sarcoma community.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.