Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25784798›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2015

Impact of β-blocker selectivity on long-term outcomes in congestive heart failure patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Yoshiaki Kubota, Kuniya Asai, Erito Furuse, Shunichi Nakamura, Koji Murai, Yayoi Tetsuou Tsukada, Wataru Shimizu

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Exploring the kinetic selectivity of drugs targeting the βPharmacology research & perspectives · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoshiaki KubotaDepartment of Medicine (Division of Cardiology), Nippon Medical School, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kuniya AsaiDepartment of Medicine (Division of Cardiology), Nippon Medical School, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Erito FuruseDepartment of Medicine (Division of Cardiology), Nippon Medical School, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Shunichi NakamuraDepartment of Medicine (Division of Cardiology), Nippon Medical School, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji MuraiDepartment of Medicine (Division of Cardiology), Nippon Medical School, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yayoi Tetsuou TsukadaDepartment of Medicine (Division of Cardiology), Nippon Medical School, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Wataru ShimizuDepartment of Medicine (Division of Cardiology), Nippon Medical School, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Nippon Medical School · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is present in approximately one-third of all congestive heart failure (CHF) patients, and is a key cause of underprescription and underdosing of β-blockers, largely owing to concerns about precipitating respiratory deterioration. For these reasons, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of β-blockers on the long-term outcomes in CHF patients with COPD. In addition, we compared the effects of two different β-blockers, carvedilol and bisoprolol.

methodsThe study was a retrospective, non-randomized, single center trial. Acute decompensated HF patients with COPD were classified according to the oral drug used at discharge into β-blocker (n=86; carvedilol [n=52] or bisoprolol [n=34]) and non-β-blocker groups (n=46). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality between the β-blocker and non-β-blocker groups during a mean clinical follow-up of 33.9 months. The secondary endpoints were the differences in all-cause mortality and the hospitalization rates for CHF and/or COPD exacerbation between patients receiving carvedilol and bisoprolol.

resultsThe mortality rate was higher in patients without β-blockers compared with those taking β-blockers (log-rank P=0.039), and univariate analyses revealed that the use of β-blockers was the only factor significantly correlated with the mortality rate (hazard ratio: 0.41; 95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.99; P=0.047). Moreover, the rate of CHF and/or COPD exacerbation was higher in patients treated with carvedilol compared with bisoprolol (log-rank P=0.033). In the multivariate analysis, only a past history of COPD exacerbation significantly increased the risk of re-hospitalization due to CHF and/or COPD exacerbation (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.11; 95% confidence interval: 1.47-6.61; P=0.003).

conclusionThese findings support the recommendations to use β-blockers in HF patients with COPD. Importantly, bisoprolol reduced the incidence of CHF and/or COPD exacerbation compared with carvedilol.

Indexed as

Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor AntagonistsAgedAged, 80 and overBisoprololCarbazolesCarvedilolDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionFemaleHeart FailureHumansJapanKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMultivariate AnalysisPatient ReadmissionAdrenergic alpha-1 Receptor AntagonistsBisoprololCarbazolesCarvedilolPropanolaminesmortalityselective β-blocker

Identifiers

PMID25784798
PMCPMC4356705
OpenAlexW2151911018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.