ArticleOncotarget2015
Stage-specific prognostic biomarkers in melanoma.
Article in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Photoacoustic imaging for cutaneous melanoma assessment: a comprehensive review.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Pooled it
- Harnessing ctDNA in Advanced Melanoma: A Promising Tool for Informed Clinical Decisions.Cancers · 2024Review
- A Penalization Method for Estimating Heterogeneous Covariate Effects in Cancer Genomic Data.Genes · 2022Article
- Current Trends in Circulating Biomarkers for Melanoma Detection.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Review
- BRAF: A Two-Faced Janus.Cells · 2020Review
- Conditional survival analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of surgical oncology · 2020Article
- Six-gene-based prognostic model predicts overall survival in patients with uveal melanoma.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2020Article
- Penalized integrative semiparametric interaction analysis for multiple genetic datasets.Statistics in medicine · 2019Article
- Identification of cancer omics commonality and difference via community fusion.Statistics in medicine · 2019Article
- Up-regulation of SERPINA3 correlates with high mortality of melanoma patients and increased migration and invasion of cancer cells.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- p27eLife · 2017Article
- Rewiring of the apoptotic TGF-β-SMAD/NFκB pathway through an oncogenic function of p27 in human papillary thyroid cancer.Oncogene · 2017Article
- Conditional disease-free survival after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: A two-center experience.Medicine · 2016Observational
- MMP-9 overexpression is associated with intragenic hypermethylation of MMP9 gene in melanoma.Aging · 2016Article
- Loss of p27Kip¹ promotes metaplasia in the pancreas via the regulation of Sox9 expression.Oncotarget · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The melanoma staging system proposed by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) (which classifies melanoma patients into four clinical stages) is currently the most widely used tool for melanoma prognostication, and clinical management decision making by clinicians. However, multiple studies have shown that melanomas within specific AJCC Stages can exhibit varying progression and clinical outcomes. Thus, additional information, such as that provided by biomarkers is needed to assist in identifying the patients at risk of disease progression. Having previously found six independent prognostic biomarkers in melanoma, including BRAF, MMP2, p27, Dicer, Fbw7 and Tip60, our group has gone on to investigate if these markers are useful in risk stratification of melanoma patients in individual AJCC stages. First, we performed Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional multivariate analyses comparing prognostication power of these markers in 254 melanoma patients for whom the expression levels were known, identifying the best performing markers as candidates for stage-specific melanoma markers. We then verified the results by incorporating an additional independent cohort (87 patients) and in a combined cohort (341 patients). Our data indicate that BRAF and MMP2 are optimal prognostic biomarkers for AJCC Stages I and II, respectively (P = 0.010, 0.000, Log-rank test); whereas p27 emerged as a good marker for AJCC Stages III/IV (0.018, 0.046, respectively, log-rank test). Thus, our study has identified stage-specific biomarkers in melanoma, a finding which may assist clinicians in designing improved personalized therapeutic modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.