Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25784527›Full record

Trial reportShock (Augusta, Ga.)2015

Combat: Initial Experience with a Randomized Clinical Trial of Plasma-Based Resuscitation in the Field for Traumatic Hemorrhagic Shock.

Michael P Chapman, Ernest E Moore, Theresa L Chin, Arsen Ghasabyan, James Chandler, John Stringham, Eduardo Gonzalez, Hunter B Moore, Anirban Banerjee, Christopher C Silliman and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Blood transfusion strategies for major bleeding in trauma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Omics Markers of Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Trauma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael P Chapman*University of Colorado-Denver; †Denver Health and Hospital Authority; and ‡Bonfils Blood Center, Denver, Colorado.
Ernest E Moore
Theresa L Chin
Arsen Ghasabyan
James Chandler
John Stringham
Eduardo Gonzalez
Hunter B Moore
Anirban Banerjee
Christopher C Silliman
Angela Sauaia
University of Colorado Denver · USHealth and Hospital Corporation · US

Funding

Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001082 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$48.0M
Analysis and Characterization of Trauma-Induced CoagulopathyUM1HL120877 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI MORRISSEY, JAMES H., WISNIEWSKI, STEPHEN R · 2013 to 2019
$26.6M
Trauma Reprograms CellsP50GM049222 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BANERJEE, ANIRBAN · 1993 to 2017
$26.1M
Mechanisms of Trauma-Induced CoagulopathyT32GM008315 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Mitchell Cohen, ELIZABETH J. KOVACS · 1991 to 2026
$7.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001082NHLBI NIH HHS UM1 HL120877NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM049222NIGMS NIH HHS P50GM049222NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008315NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM008315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The existing evidence shows great promise for plasma as the first resuscitation fluid in both civilian and military trauma. We embarked on the Control of Major Bleeding After Trauma (COMBAT) trial with the support of the Department of Defense to determine if plasma-first resuscitation yields hemostatic and survival benefits. The methodology of the COMBAT study represents not only 3 years of development work but also the integration of nearly two decades of technical experience with the design and implementation of other clinical trials and studies. Herein, we describe the key features of the study design, critical personnel and infrastructural elements, and key innovations. We will also briefly outline the systems engineering challenges entailed by this study. The COMBAT trial is a randomized, placebo-controlled, semiblinded, prospective, phase IIB clinical trial conducted in a ground ambulance fleet based at a level I trauma center and part of a multicenter collaboration. The primary objective of the COMBAT trial is to determine the efficacy of field resuscitation with plasma first compared with standard of care (normal saline). To date, we have enrolled 30 subjects in the COMBAT study. The ability to achieve intervention with a hemostatic resuscitation agent in the closest possible temporal proximity to injury is critical and represents an opportunity to forestall the evolution of the "bloody vicious cycle." Thus, the COMBAT model for deploying plasma in first-response units should serve as a model for randomized clinical trials of other hemostatic resuscitative agents.

Indexed as

AdultBlood BanksFemaleFluid TherapyHemostasisHumansMaleMilitary MedicinePlasmaProspective StudiesResearch DesignResuscitationShock, HemorrhagicShock, TraumaticSystems TheoryTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID25784527
PMCPMC4504796
OpenAlexW1975792328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.