Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25784350›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2015

Exposing and addressing tobacco industry conduct in low-income and middle-income countries.

Anna B Gilmore, Gary Fooks, Jeffrey Drope, Stella Aguinaga Bialous, Rachel Rose Jackson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 207 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
207citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

207 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Feminine Appeals on Cigarette Packs Sold in 14 Countries.International journal of public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Addressing Legal Risks in Public Health Communication Campaigns.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

147 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna B GilmoreDepartment for Health and UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, University of Bath, Bath, UK. Electronic address: a.gilmore@bath.ac.uk.
Gary FooksDepartment for Health and UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Jeffrey DropeAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Political Science, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Stella Aguinaga BialousSocial and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Rachel Rose JacksonDepartment for Health and UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, University of Bath, Bath, UK.

Funding

Tobacco Companies, Global Governance and Public HealthR01CA160695 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF BATH · PI GILMORE, ANNA B · 2011 to 2013
$1.3M
Building Research and Capacity on the Economic Policy-Tobacco Control Nexus in AfR01DA035158 · NIDA · AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY, INC. · PI DROPE, JEFFREY · 2012 to 2016
$1.3M
Medical Research Council MR/K023195/1NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160695NCI NIH HHS R01CA160695NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035158NIDA NIH HHS R01DA035158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tobacco industry's future depends on increasing tobacco use in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), which face a growing burden of tobacco-related disease, yet have potential to prevent full-scale escalation of this epidemic. To drive up sales the industry markets its products heavily, deliberately targeting non-smokers and keeps prices low until smoking and local economies are sufficiently established to drive prices and profits up. The industry systematically flaunts existing tobacco control legislation and works aggressively to prevent future policies using its resource advantage to present highly misleading economic arguments, rebrand political activities as corporate social responsibility, and establish and use third parties to make its arguments more palatable. Increasingly it is using domestic litigation and international arbitration to bully LMICs from implementing effective policies and hijacking the problem of tobacco smuggling for policy gain, attempting to put itself in control of an illegal trade in which there is overwhelming historical evidence of its complicity. Progress will not be realised until tobacco industry interference is actively addressed as outlined in Article 5.3 of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Exemplar LMICs show this action can be achieved and indicate that exposing tobacco industry misconduct is an essential first step.

Indexed as

Codes of EthicsCrimeDeveloping CountriesFemaleFinancing, OrganizedHumansIncomeMaleMarketingSmokingSmoking PreventionTobacco Industry

Identifiers

PMID25784350
PMCPMC4382920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.