Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25784174›Full record

Trial reportClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2015

Effect of lisinopril and atenolol on aortic stiffness in patients on hemodialysis.

Panagiotis I Georgianos, Rajiv Agarwal

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interventions for fatigue in people with kidney failure requiring dialysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Arterial stiffness in end-stage renal disease-pathogenesis, clinical epidemiology, and therapeutic potentials.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Reducing arterial stiffness in CKD: revising the paradigms.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Panagiotis I GeorgianosDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine and Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Administration Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Rajiv AgarwalDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine and Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Administration Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana ragarwal@iu.edu.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

Hypertension in Hemodialysis PatientsR01DK062030 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI AGARWAL, RAJIV · 2003 to 2013
$3.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS 2R01-DK062030-10NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK062030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesWhether improvements in arterial compliance with BP lowering are because of BP reduction alone or if pleiotropic effects of antihypertensive agents contribute remains unclear. It was hypothesized that, among patients on hemodialysis, compared with a β-blocker (atenolol), a lisinopril-based therapy will better reduce arterial stiffness. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Among 200 participants of the Hypertension in Hemodialysis Patients Treated with Atenolol or Lisinopril Trial, 179 patients with valid assessment of aortic pulse wave velocity at baseline (89 patients randomly assigned to open-label lisinopril and 90 patients randomly assigned to atenolol three times a week after dialysis) were included in the secondary analysis. Among them, 109 patients had a valid pulse wave velocity measurement at 6 months. Monthly measured home BP was targeted to <140/90 mmHg by addition of antihypertensive drugs and dry weight adjustment. The difference between drugs in percentage change of aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to 6 months was analyzed.

resultsContrary to the hypothesis, atenolol-based treatment induced greater reduction in aortic pulse wave velocity relative to lisinopril (between drug difference, 14.8%; 95% confidence interval, 1.5% to 28.5%; P=0.03). Reduction in 44-hour ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP was no different between groups (median [25th, 75th percentile]; atenolol: -21.5 [-37.7, -7.6] versus lisinopril: -15.8 [-28.8, -1.5] mmHg; P=0.27 for systolic BP; -14.1 [-22.6, -5.3] versus -10.9 [-18.4, -0.9] mmHg, respectively; P=0.30 for diastolic BP). Between-drug difference in change of aortic pulse wave velocity persisted after adjustments for age, sex, race, other cardiovascular risk factors, and baseline ambulatory systolic BP but disappeared after adjustment for change in ambulatory systolic BP (11.8%; 95% confidence interval, -2.3% to 25.9%; P=0.10).

conclusionsAmong patients on dialysis, atenolol was superior in improving arterial stiffness. However, differences between atenolol and lisinopril in improving aortic stiffness among patients on hemodialysis may be explained by BP-lowering effects of drugs.

Indexed as

Renal DialysisAdrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsAdultAgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsAtenololBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryFemaleHumansIndianaKidney DiseasesLisinoprilMaleMiddle AgedAdrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsAtenololLisinoprilaortic stiffnesshemodialysishypertension

Identifiers

PMID25784174
PMCPMC4386263
OpenAlexW2151897466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.