Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2015
A phase II study of bendamustine plus rituximab in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma previously treated with rituximab: BRB study.
Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined rituximab, bendamustine, and dexamethasone chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma: a multicenter phase II study.International journal of hematology · 2019Trial
- The PARP Inhibitor Veliparib Can Be Safely Added to Bendamustine and Rituximab and Has Preliminary Evidence of Activity in B-Cell Lymphoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017Trial
- Cost-effectiveness of obinutuzumab plus bendamustine in Chinese patients with relapse and refractory follicular lymphoma.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2023Article
- [Analysis of clinical factors of bendamustine combined with rituximab in the treatment of recurrent follicular lymphoma].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2022Article
- Clinical Practice Guideline: Follicular Lymphoma—Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-up.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2021Article
- Effectiveness of bendamustine in relapsed or refractory lymphoma cases: a Turkish Oncology Group study.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2021Article
- Frontline Treatment for Older Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma.The oncologist · 2018Review
- [Progress of bendamustine in the treatment of B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combined regimen of bendamustine (B) and rituximab (R) in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHLs) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Patients aged 20-79 years with pathologically confirmed B-NHLs or MCL, which were r/r after 1-2 R-containing regimens, were included in this study. The BR regimen consisted of B (90 mg/m(2)) for two consecutive days and R (375 mg/m(2)) on day 1, 2, or 3. The course was repeated every 4 weeks for up to four cycles. Fifty-three patients were enrolled in this study and analyzed. The diagnosis included follicular lymphoma (FL) (77 %), mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (13 %) and others (10 %). Forty-seven (90 %) patients completed four cycles of treatment as per schedule. Best overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR) was 94 and 71 %, respectively (for FL, ORR 95 % and CRR 80 %). The treatment was well tolerated and the primary toxicity was myelosuppression; the incidence of grade 3/4 leukopenia and neutropenia were 42 and 40 %, respectively. There were no grade 5 toxicities. The BR regimen is safe in Japanese patients with r/r indolent B-NHLs and MCL, and is effective for those with r/r indolent B-NHLs. For the evaluation of late toxicity, especially infection, longer follow-up of this cohort is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.