ArticleBMC women's health2015
Integration of HIV and cervical cancer screening perceptions and preferences of communities in Uganda.
Article in BMC women's health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Health systems facilitators and barriers to the integration of HIV and chronic disease services: a systematic review.Health policy and planning · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- Examining stigma associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer screening and treatment in Africa: a scoping review.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
- Barriers and facilitators to the integration of cervical cancer screening and treatment service with antiretroviral therapy follow-up clinics for women living with HIV in Northwest Ethiopia: a qualitative study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Integration of cervical cancer screening into healthcare facilities in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Acceptability of Integrated Community-Based HIV and Cervical Cancer Screening in Mayuge District, Uganda.JCO global oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Mapping the effectiveness of integrating mental health in HIV programs: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Acceptability of integration of cervical cancer screening into routine HIV care, associated factors and perceptions among HIV-infected women: a mixed methods study at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, Uganda.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Cancer Risk Studies and Priority Areas for Cancer Risk Appraisal in Uganda.Annals of global health · 2020Review
- Cervical Cancer Screening among Women Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy in a Resource-Limited Environment.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2020Article
- Knowledge, facilitators and barriers to cervical cancer screening among women in Uganda: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2017Article
- To expand coverage, or increase frequency: Quantifying the tradeoffs between equity and efficiency facing cervical cancer screening programs in low-resource settings.International journal of cancer · 2017Article
- Women's knowledge and attitudes towards cervical cancer prevention: a cross sectional study in Eastern Uganda.BMC women's health · 2017Article
- Uptake and correlates of cervical cancer screening among HIV-infected women attending HIV care in Uganda.Global health action · 2017Article
- Motivations and barriers to cervical cancer screening among HIV infected women in HIV care: a qualitative study.BMC women's health · 2015Article
- Influencing factors on cervical cancer screening from the Kurdish women's perspective: A qualitative study.Journal of medicine and life · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the fact that HIV-positive women carry an increased risk of developing cervical cancer (CC) in comparison with HIV-negative women, HIV and CC screening programs in many developing countries have remained unintegrated. The objective of this study is to explore perceptions and preferences of community members in Uganda, including women, men, and village health teams, regarding the integration of HIV and CC screening services in a single-visit approach.
methodsThis qualitative study was conducted in three districts in Uganda. Data were collected through focus group discussions with women and village health teams, and individual interviews with men. Respondents were purposely selected from among those linked to three CC clinics in the three districts. The content analysis method was used to analyze the data.
resultsThree themes emerged from the data, namely appreciating the benefits of integration, worrying about the challenges of integration, and preferences for integration. The women endorsed the benefits. However, there were worries that integration would prolong the waiting time at the health facility and induce tiredness in both the healthcare providers and the women. There were also fears of being found positive for both HIV and CC and the consequences such as stress, self-isolation, and social conflicts. Participants, particularly the women, considered the challenges of screening integration to be manageable by, for example, taking a day off work to visit the hospital, delegating house chores to other family members, or taking a packed lunch on visiting the hospital.
conclusionsThe community members in Uganda perceive the benefits of HIV and CC screening integration to outweigh the challenges, and expect that the challenges can be minimized or managed by the women. Therefore, when considering HIV and CC screening integration, it is important to not only recognize the benefits but also take into consideration the perceived challenges and preferences of community members.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.