Trial reportJournal of psychiatric research2015
A rest-activity biomarker to predict response to SSRIs in major depressive disorder.
Trial report in Journal of psychiatric research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reducing Suicidal Ideation Through Insomnia Treatment (REST-IT): A Randomized Clinical Trial.The American journal of psychiatry · 2019Trial
- An exploration of actigraphy in the context of ketamine and treatment-resistant depression.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2023Article
- Circadian rhythm biomarker from wearable device data is related to concurrent antidepressant treatment response.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- Digital health tools for the passive monitoring of depression: a systematic review of methods.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Review
- Association Between Time Spent on Electronic Devices and Body Mass Index in Young Adults.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2022Article
- Comparison of actigraphy indices among patients with depression and schizophrenia: A preliminary study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2021Article
- Actigraphic recording of motor activity in depressed inpatients: a novel computational approach to prediction of clinical course and hospital discharge.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Wearables in Medicine.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2018Article
- Rest-activity rhythm and sleep characteristics associated with depression symptom severity in strained dementia caregivers.Journal of sleep research · 2017Article
- Biomarkers for depression: recent insights, current challenges and future prospects.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2017Review
- Opportunities for clinical applications of rest-activity rhythms in detecting and preventing mood disorders.Current opinion in psychiatry · 2016Review
- The Rise of Consumer Health Wearables: Promises and Barriers.PLoS medicine · 2016Review
- What's in a delayed bathyphase?Journal of psychiatric research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Most adults with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) will not experience a remission with the first antidepressant trial. No practical biomarkers presently exist to predict responsiveness to antidepressants. Herein we report pilot data for a rest-activity biomarker of antidepressant response. Fifty-eight medication-free adults with MDD underwent a week-long collection of actigraphic data before beginning a 9 week open label trial of fluoxetine, coupled with blinded randomized assignment to eszopiclone/placebo. Depression severity was repeatedly measured with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD). Baseline actigraphic data was analyzed with functional data analysis to create smoothed 24-h curves of activity. The time of the lowest point of activity (the bathyphase) was calculated for each patient, as well the mean difference between bedtime and the bathyphase (BBD). At the end of treatment, patients were characterized as treatment responders (50% reduction in HRSD) or non-responders, and receiver operating curves were calculated to find the optimal cut point of the BBD for prediction of treatment response. The best cut point for BBD was at 260.2 min, resulting in an effect size of 1.45, and with a positive predictive value of 0.75 and a negative predictive value of 0.88. We conclude that actigraphically-determined measures of rest-activity patterns show promise as potential biomarker predictors of antidepressant response. However, this conclusion is based upon a small number of patients who received only one choice of antidepressant, for a single trial. Replication with a larger sample is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.